From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the ext4 tree
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 11:28:56 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240514112856.5fec87d3@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240508103436.589bb440@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1422 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Wed, 8 May 2024 10:34:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/ext4/file.c
>
> between commit:
>
> a0c7cce824a5 ("ext4: set FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT instead of a dummy direct_IO method")
>
> from the ext4 tree and commit:
>
> 210a03c9d51a ("fs: claw back a few FMODE_* bits")
>
> from the vfs-brauner tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc fs/ext4/file.c
> index 77529c655f95,28c51b0cc4db..000000000000
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@@ -884,8 -885,7 +884,7 @@@ static int ext4_file_open(struct inode
> return ret;
> }
>
> - filp->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT | FMODE_BUF_RASYNC |
> - FMODE_DIO_PARALLEL_WRITE | FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT;
> - filp->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT;
> ++ filp->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT | FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT;
> return dquot_file_open(inode, filp);
> }
>
This is now a conflict between the ext4 tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-14 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-08 0:34 linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the ext4 tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-08 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-08 6:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-08 22:04 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-05-14 1:28 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-06-11 13:45 Mark Brown
2026-06-11 14:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-27 17:38 Mark Brown
2026-03-30 8:30 ` Jan Kara
2024-09-03 23:15 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-16 22:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-21 0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-21 0:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240514112856.5fec87d3@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.