All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,xuyu@linux.alibaba.com,willy@infradead.org,stable@vger.kernel.org,shy828301@gmail.com,nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,david@redhat.com,linmiaohe@huawei.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [alternative-merged] mm-huge_memory-mark-huge_zero_page-reserved.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 15:01:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240514220158.56A8EC32786@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm/huge_memory: mark huge_zero_page reserved
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-huge_memory-mark-huge_zero_page-reserved.patch

This patch was dropped because an alternative patch was or shall be merged

------------------------------------------------------
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Subject: mm/huge_memory: mark huge_zero_page reserved
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 11:54:35 +0800

When I did memory failure tests recently, below panic occurs:

 kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1135!
 invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
 CPU: 9 PID: 137 Comm: kswapd1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-00491-gd5ce28f156fe-dirty #14
 RIP: 0010:shrink_huge_zero_page_scan+0x168/0x1a0
 RSP: 0018:ffff9933c6c57bd0 EFLAGS: 00000246
 RAX: 000000000000003e RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88f61fc5c9c8
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff88f61fc5c9c0
 RBP: ffffcd7c446b0000 R08: ffffffff9a9405f0 R09: 0000000000005492
 R10: 00000000000030ea R11: ffffffff9a9405f0 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88e703c4ac00
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88f61fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 000055f4da6e9878 CR3: 0000000c71048000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  do_shrink_slab+0x14f/0x6a0
  shrink_slab+0xca/0x8c0
  shrink_node+0x2d0/0x7d0
  balance_pgdat+0x33a/0x720
  kswapd+0x1f3/0x410
  kthread+0xd5/0x100
  ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
  </TASK>
 Modules linked in: mce_inject hwpoison_inject
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
 RIP: 0010:shrink_huge_zero_page_scan+0x168/0x1a0
 RSP: 0018:ffff9933c6c57bd0 EFLAGS: 00000246
 RAX: 000000000000003e RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88f61fc5c9c8
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff88f61fc5c9c0
 RBP: ffffcd7c446b0000 R08: ffffffff9a9405f0 R09: 0000000000005492
 R10: 00000000000030ea R11: ffffffff9a9405f0 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88e703c4ac00
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88f61fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 000055f4da6e9878 CR3: 0000000c71048000 CR4: 00000000000006f0

The root cause is that HWPoison flag will be set for huge_zero_page
without increasing the page refcnt. But then unpoison_memory() will
decrease the page refcnt unexpectly as it appears like a successfully
hwpoisoned page leading to VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)
when releasing huge_zero_page.

Fix this issue by marking huge_zero_page reserved. So unpoison_memory()
will skip this page. This will make it consistent with ZERO_PAGE case too.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240511035435.1477004-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: 478d134e9506 ("mm/huge_memory: do not overkill when splitting huge_zero_page")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Cc: Xu Yu <xuyu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/huge_memory.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/mm/huge_memory.c~mm-huge_memory-mark-huge_zero_page-reserved
+++ a/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ retry:
 		folio_put(zero_folio);
 		goto retry;
 	}
+	__SetPageReserved(zero_page);
 	WRITE_ONCE(huge_zero_pfn, folio_pfn(zero_folio));
 
 	/* We take additional reference here. It will be put back by shrinker */
@@ -264,6 +265,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_huge_zero_pa
 		struct folio *zero_folio = xchg(&huge_zero_folio, NULL);
 		BUG_ON(zero_folio == NULL);
 		WRITE_ONCE(huge_zero_pfn, ~0UL);
+		__ClearPageReserved(zero_page);
 		folio_put(zero_folio);
 		return HPAGE_PMD_NR;
 	}
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from linmiaohe@huawei.com are



                 reply	other threads:[~2024-05-14 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240514220158.56A8EC32786@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xuyu@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.