From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4 v2] perf: Fix leaked sigtrap events
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:43:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240515144311.16038-1-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi,
After discussions with Sebastian, here is an updated version of
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240329235812.18917-1-frederic@kernel.org/
Changes since v2:
* Use rcuwait instead of waitqueue (more RT-friendly when preemption is
disabled)
* Add a few comments about RCU-ordering expectations
Thanks.
Frederic Weisbecker (4):
task_work: s/task_work_cancel()/task_work_cancel_func()/
task_work: Introduce task_work_cancel() again
perf: Fix event leak upon exit
perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release
include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
include/linux/task_work.h | 3 ++-
kernel/events/core.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +-
kernel/task_work.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
security/keys/keyctl.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
2.44.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-05-15 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-15 14:43 Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-05-15 14:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] task_work: s/task_work_cancel()/task_work_cancel_func()/ Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 14:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] task_work: Introduce task_work_cancel() again Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 14:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: Fix event leak upon exit Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-16 11:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-15 14:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: Fix event leak upon exec and file release Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-16 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240515144311.16038-1-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.