All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henry Wang <xin.wang2@amd.com>
To: <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Vikram Garhwal <fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
	Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@arm.com>,
	Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com>,
	"Volodymyr Babchuk" <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>,
	Henry Wang <xin.wang2@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/8] xen/arm/gic: Allow routing/removing interrupt to running VMs
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 18:03:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240516100330.1433265-6-xin.wang2@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240516100330.1433265-1-xin.wang2@amd.com>

From: Vikram Garhwal <fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>

Currently, routing/removing physical interrupts are only allowed at
the domain creation/destroy time. For use cases such as dynamic device
tree overlay adding/removing, the routing/removing of physical IRQ to
running domains should be allowed.

Removing the above-mentioned domain creation/dying check. Since this
will introduce interrupt state unsync issues for cases when the
interrupt is active or pending in the guest, therefore for these cases
we simply reject the operation. Do it for both new and old vGIC
implementations.

Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Henry Wang <xin.wang2@amd.com>
---
v2:
- Reject the case where the IRQ is active or pending in guest.
---
 xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c  |  8 ++++++--
 xen/arch/arm/gic.c       | 15 ---------------
 xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c |  5 +++--
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
index 56490dbc43..d1608415f8 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c
@@ -444,14 +444,18 @@ int vgic_connect_hw_irq(struct domain *d, struct vcpu *v, unsigned int virq,
     {
         /* The VIRQ should not be already enabled by the guest */
         if ( !p->desc &&
-             !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status) )
+             !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ENABLED, &p->status) &&
+             !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status) &&
+             !test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ACTIVE, &p->status) )
             p->desc = desc;
         else
             ret = -EBUSY;
     }
     else
     {
-        if ( desc && p->desc != desc )
+        if ( desc && p->desc != desc &&
+             (test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_VISIBLE, &p->status) ||
+              test_bit(GIC_IRQ_GUEST_ACTIVE, &p->status)) )
             ret = -EINVAL;
         else
             p->desc = NULL;
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
index 44c40e86de..3ebd89940a 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
@@ -135,14 +135,6 @@ int gic_route_irq_to_guest(struct domain *d, unsigned int virq,
     ASSERT(virq < vgic_num_irqs(d));
     ASSERT(!is_lpi(virq));
 
-    /*
-     * When routing an IRQ to guest, the virtual state is not synced
-     * back to the physical IRQ. To prevent get unsync, restrict the
-     * routing to when the Domain is been created.
-     */
-    if ( d->creation_finished )
-        return -EBUSY;
-
     ret = vgic_connect_hw_irq(d, NULL, virq, desc, true);
     if ( ret )
         return ret;
@@ -167,13 +159,6 @@ int gic_remove_irq_from_guest(struct domain *d, unsigned int virq,
     ASSERT(test_bit(_IRQ_GUEST, &desc->status));
     ASSERT(!is_lpi(virq));
 
-    /*
-     * Removing an interrupt while the domain is running may have
-     * undesirable effect on the vGIC emulation.
-     */
-    if ( !d->is_dying )
-        return -EBUSY;
-
     desc->handler->shutdown(desc);
 
     /* EOI the IRQ if it has not been done by the guest */
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index b9463a5f27..785ef2b192 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ int vgic_connect_hw_irq(struct domain *d, struct vcpu *vcpu,
     if ( connect )                      /* assign a mapped IRQ */
     {
         /* The VIRQ should not be already enabled by the guest */
-        if ( !irq->hw && !irq->enabled )
+        if ( !irq->hw && !irq->enabled && !irq->active && !irq->pending_latch )
         {
             irq->hw = true;
             irq->hwintid = desc->irq;
@@ -887,7 +887,8 @@ int vgic_connect_hw_irq(struct domain *d, struct vcpu *vcpu,
     }
     else                                /* remove a mapped IRQ */
     {
-        if ( desc && irq->hwintid != desc->irq )
+        if ( desc && irq->hwintid != desc->irq &&
+             (irq->active || irq->pending_latch) )
         {
             ret = -EINVAL;
         }
-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-16 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-16 10:03 [PATCH v2 0/8] Remaining patches for dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo Henry Wang
2024-05-16 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] xen/common/dt-overlay: Fix lock issue when add/remove the device Henry Wang
2024-05-19 10:04   ` Julien Grall
2024-05-16 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] tools/xl: Correct the help information and exit code of the dt-overlay command Henry Wang
2024-05-20 18:48   ` Jason Andryuk
2024-05-16 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] xen/arm, doc: Add a DT property to specify IOMMU for Dom0less domUs Henry Wang
2024-05-19 10:17   ` Julien Grall
2024-05-20  0:41     ` Henry Wang
2024-05-20  1:38       ` Henry Wang
2024-05-20  1:40       ` Henry Wang
2024-05-16 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] tools/arm: Introduce the "nr_spis" xl config entry Henry Wang
2024-05-20 19:13   ` Jason Andryuk
2024-05-20 23:19     ` Henry Wang
2024-05-16 10:03 ` Henry Wang [this message]
2024-05-17  6:03   ` [PATCH v2 5/8] xen/arm/gic: Allow routing/removing interrupt to running VMs Henry Wang
2024-05-19 11:08     ` Julien Grall
2024-05-20  1:01       ` Henry Wang
2024-05-20  9:50         ` Julien Grall
2024-05-21  2:29           ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-05-16 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] xen/arm: Add XEN_DOMCTL_dt_overlay DOMCTL and related operations Henry Wang
2024-05-16 12:31   ` Jan Beulich
2024-05-17  1:36     ` Henry Wang
2024-05-17  7:11       ` Jan Beulich
2024-05-16 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] tools: Introduce the "xl dt-overlay {attach,detach}" commands Henry Wang
2024-05-20 19:41   ` Jason Andryuk
2024-05-20 23:21     ` Henry Wang
2024-05-16 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] docs: Add device tree overlay documentation Henry Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240516100330.1433265-6-xin.wang2@amd.com \
    --to=xin.wang2@amd.com \
    --cc=Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=bertrand.marquis@arm.com \
    --cc=fnu.vikram@xilinx.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.