From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kernel@openeuler.org, Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 8557/22438] mm/swapfile.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .text.unlikely
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 01:37:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202405170118.NQpCse4L-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS
head: 8ac9764e4f9b88e554a8dafd8283dab32512691c
commit: 775947c125d5bd6e00e0dcf9d12c57fd5d44d07f [8557/22438] asm-generic: fix -Wtype-limits compiler warnings
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-001-20240516 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240517/202405170118.NQpCse4L-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-4ubuntu1) 11.4.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240517/202405170118.NQpCse4L-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405170118.NQpCse4L-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> mm/swapfile.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .text.unlikely
--
In file included from include/linux/sctp.h:57,
from net/core/dev.c:145:
include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:390:1: warning: alignment 4 of 'struct sctp_paddr_change' is less than 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
390 | } __attribute__((packed, aligned(4)));
| ^
include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:719:1: warning: alignment 4 of 'struct sctp_setpeerprim' is less than 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
719 | } __attribute__((packed, aligned(4)));
| ^
include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:718:33: warning: 'sspp_addr' offset 4 in 'struct sctp_setpeerprim' isn't aligned to 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
718 | struct sockaddr_storage sspp_addr;
| ^~~~~~~~~
include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:732:1: warning: alignment 4 of 'struct sctp_prim' is less than 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
732 | } __attribute__((packed, aligned(4)));
| ^
include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:731:33: warning: 'ssp_addr' offset 4 in 'struct sctp_prim' isn't aligned to 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
731 | struct sockaddr_storage ssp_addr;
| ^~~~~~~~
include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:783:1: warning: alignment 4 of 'struct sctp_paddrparams' is less than 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
783 | } __attribute__((packed, aligned(4)));
| ^
include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:775:33: warning: 'spp_address' offset 4 in 'struct sctp_paddrparams' isn't aligned to 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
775 | struct sockaddr_storage spp_address;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:896:1: warning: alignment 4 of 'struct sctp_paddrinfo' is less than 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
896 | } __attribute__((packed, aligned(4)));
| ^
include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:890:33: warning: 'spinfo_address' offset 4 in 'struct sctp_paddrinfo' isn't aligned to 8 [-Wpacked-not-aligned]
890 | struct sockaddr_storage spinfo_address;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:23,
from net/core/dev.c:92:
include/linux/skbuff.h: In function '__skb_metadata_differs':
include/linux/skbuff.h:3501:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
3501 | case 32: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3502:9: note: here
3502 | case 24: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~~~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3502:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
3502 | case 24: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3503:9: note: here
3503 | case 16: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~~~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3503:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
3503 | case 16: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3504:9: note: here
3504 | case 8: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~~~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3506:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
3506 | case 28: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3507:9: note: here
3507 | case 20: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~~~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3507:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
3507 | case 20: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3508:9: note: here
3508 | case 12: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~~~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3508:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
3508 | case 12: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 64);
| ^~
include/linux/skbuff.h:3509:9: note: here
3509 | case 4: diffs |= __it_diff(a, b, 32);
| ^~~~
>> net/core/dev.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .text.unlikely
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2024-05-16 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202405170118.NQpCse4L-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@openeuler.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.