From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: steven@liquorix.net
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [zen:6.9/prjc 461/472] kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4207:14: error: call to undeclared function '__best_mask_cpu'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 18:34:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202405171813.gP8HoPQJ-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://github.com/zen-kernel/zen-kernel 6.9/prjc
head: 90e00625dbe63d991978337198b3c43a1df585c9
commit: f90f6c0ad3cb7786aa8308e4669ea037dabf7476 [461/472] sched/alt: Generic active_balance_cpu_stop()
config: um-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240517/202405171813.gP8HoPQJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240517/202405171813.gP8HoPQJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405171813.gP8HoPQJ-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/sched/alt_core.c:19:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/sched/alt_core.c:19:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/sched/alt_core.c:19:
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:7:
In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from kernel/sched/alt_core.c:48:
kernel/sched/smp.h:14:20: error: redefinition of 'flush_smp_call_function_queue'
14 | static inline void flush_smp_call_function_queue(void) { }
| ^
kernel/sched/alt_sched.h:357:20: note: previous definition is here
357 | static inline void flush_smp_call_function_queue(void) { }
| ^
>> kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4207:14: error: call to undeclared function '__best_mask_cpu'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
4207 | int dcpu = __best_mask_cpu(&tmp, per_cpu(sched_cpu_llc_mask, cpu_of(rq)));
| ^
kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4207:14: note: did you mean '__set_task_cpu'?
kernel/sched/alt_core.c:1514:20: note: '__set_task_cpu' declared here
1514 | static inline void __set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
| ^
>> kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4207:44: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sched_cpu_llc_mask'; did you mean 'sched_idle_mask'?
4207 | int dcpu = __best_mask_cpu(&tmp, per_cpu(sched_cpu_llc_mask, cpu_of(rq)));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| sched_idle_mask
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:269:43: note: expanded from macro 'per_cpu'
269 | #define per_cpu(var, cpu) (*per_cpu_ptr(&(var), cpu))
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:263:65: note: expanded from macro 'per_cpu_ptr'
263 | #define per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu) ({ (void)(cpu); VERIFY_PERCPU_PTR(ptr); })
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:259:20: note: expanded from macro 'VERIFY_PERCPU_PTR'
259 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(__p); \
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:219:47: note: expanded from macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr'
219 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \
| ^
kernel/sched/alt_core.c:155:25: note: 'sched_idle_mask' declared here
155 | static cpumask_t *const sched_idle_mask = &sched_preempt_mask[SCHED_QUEUE_BITS - 1];
| ^
>> kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4207:44: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sched_cpu_llc_mask'; did you mean 'sched_idle_mask'?
4207 | int dcpu = __best_mask_cpu(&tmp, per_cpu(sched_cpu_llc_mask, cpu_of(rq)));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| sched_idle_mask
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:269:43: note: expanded from macro 'per_cpu'
269 | #define per_cpu(var, cpu) (*per_cpu_ptr(&(var), cpu))
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:263:65: note: expanded from macro 'per_cpu_ptr'
263 | #define per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu) ({ (void)(cpu); VERIFY_PERCPU_PTR(ptr); })
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:260:12: note: expanded from macro 'VERIFY_PERCPU_PTR'
260 | (typeof(*(__p)) __kernel __force *)(__p); \
| ^
kernel/sched/alt_core.c:155:25: note: 'sched_idle_mask' declared here
155 | static cpumask_t *const sched_idle_mask = &sched_preempt_mask[SCHED_QUEUE_BITS - 1];
| ^
>> kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4207:44: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sched_cpu_llc_mask'; did you mean 'sched_idle_mask'?
4207 | int dcpu = __best_mask_cpu(&tmp, per_cpu(sched_cpu_llc_mask, cpu_of(rq)));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| sched_idle_mask
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:269:43: note: expanded from macro 'per_cpu'
269 | #define per_cpu(var, cpu) (*per_cpu_ptr(&(var), cpu))
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:263:65: note: expanded from macro 'per_cpu_ptr'
263 | #define per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu) ({ (void)(cpu); VERIFY_PERCPU_PTR(ptr); })
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:260:38: note: expanded from macro 'VERIFY_PERCPU_PTR'
260 | (typeof(*(__p)) __kernel __force *)(__p); \
| ^
kernel/sched/alt_core.c:155:25: note: 'sched_idle_mask' declared here
155 | static cpumask_t *const sched_idle_mask = &sched_preempt_mask[SCHED_QUEUE_BITS - 1];
| ^
>> kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4208:8: error: call to undeclared function 'move_queued_task'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
4208 | rq = move_queued_task(rq, p, dcpu);
| ^
>> kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4208:6: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct rq *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
4208 | rq = move_queued_task(rq, p, dcpu);
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4245:19: error: no member named 'active_balance_work' in 'struct rq'
4245 | arg, &rq->active_balance_work);
| ~~ ^
kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4721:2: error: call to undeclared function 'hrtick_start'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
4721 | hrtick_start(rq, next->time_slice);
| ^
kernel/sched/alt_core.c:4721:2: note: did you mean 'hrtimer_start'?
include/linux/hrtimer.h:272:20: note: 'hrtimer_start' declared here
272 | static inline void hrtimer_start(struct hrtimer *timer, ktime_t tim,
| ^
kernel/sched/alt_core.c:7683:47: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sched_sg_idle_mask'; did you mean 'sched_idle_mask'?
7683 | struct balance_arg balance_arg = {.cpumask = sched_sg_idle_mask, .active = 0};
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| sched_idle_mask
kernel/sched/alt_core.c:155:25: note: 'sched_idle_mask' declared here
155 | static cpumask_t *const sched_idle_mask = &sched_preempt_mask[SCHED_QUEUE_BITS - 1];
| ^
12 warnings and 10 errors generated.
vim +/__best_mask_cpu +4207 kernel/sched/alt_core.c
4188
4189 static int active_balance_cpu_stop(void *data)
4190 {
4191 struct balance_arg *arg = data;
4192 struct task_struct *p = arg->task;
4193 struct rq *rq = this_rq();
4194 unsigned long flags;
4195 cpumask_t tmp;
4196
4197 local_irq_save(flags);
4198
4199 raw_spin_lock(&p->pi_lock);
4200 raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
4201
4202 arg->active = 0;
4203
4204 if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && task_rq(p) == rq &&
4205 cpumask_and(&tmp, p->cpus_ptr, arg->cpumask) &&
4206 !is_migration_disabled(p)) {
> 4207 int dcpu = __best_mask_cpu(&tmp, per_cpu(sched_cpu_llc_mask, cpu_of(rq)));
> 4208 rq = move_queued_task(rq, p, dcpu);
4209 }
4210
4211 raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
4212 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
4213
4214 return 0;
4215 }
4216
4217 /* trigger_active_balance - for @cpu/@rq */
4218 static inline int
4219 trigger_active_balance(struct rq *src_rq, struct rq *rq, struct balance_arg *arg)
4220 {
4221 unsigned long flags;
4222 struct task_struct *p;
4223 int res;
4224
4225 if (!raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags))
4226 return 0;
4227
4228 res = (1 == rq->nr_running) && \
4229 !is_migration_disabled((p = sched_rq_first_task(rq))) && \
4230 cpumask_intersects(p->cpus_ptr, arg->cpumask) && \
4231 !arg->active;
4232 if (res) {
4233 arg->task = p;
4234
4235 arg->active = 1;
4236 }
4237
4238 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
4239
4240 if (res) {
4241 preempt_disable();
4242 raw_spin_unlock(&src_rq->lock);
4243
4244 stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(rq), active_balance_cpu_stop,
> 4245 arg, &rq->active_balance_work);
4246
4247 preempt_enable();
4248 raw_spin_lock(&src_rq->lock);
4249 }
4250
4251 return res;
4252 }
4253
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2024-05-17 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202405171813.gP8HoPQJ-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=steven@liquorix.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.