All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: nalramli@fastly.com, Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org (open list:KERNEL SELFTEST
	FRAMEWORK)
Subject: [PATCH net] testing: net-drv: use stats64 for testing
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 23:58:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240520235850.190041-1-jdamato@fastly.com> (raw)

Testing a network device that has large numbers of bytes/packets may
overflow. Using stats64 when comparing fixes this problem.

I tripped on this while iterating on a qstats patch for mlx5. See below
for confirmation without my added code that this is a bug.

Before this patch (with added debugging output):

$ NETIF=eth0 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py
KTAP version 1
1..4
ok 1 stats.check_pause
ok 2 stats.check_fec
rstat: 481708634 qstat: 666201639514 key: tx-bytes
not ok 3 stats.pkt_byte_sum
ok 4 stats.qstat_by_ifindex

Note the huge delta above ^^^ in the rtnl vs qstats.

After this patch:

$ NETIF=eth0 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py
KTAP version 1
1..4
ok 1 stats.check_pause
ok 2 stats.check_fec
ok 3 stats.pkt_byte_sum
ok 4 stats.qstat_by_ifindex

It looks like rtnl_fill_stats in net/core/rtnetlink.c will attempt to
copy the 64bit stats into a 32bit structure which is probably why this
behavior is occurring.

To show this is happening, you can get the underlying stats that the
stats.py test uses like this:

$ ./cli.py --spec ../../../Documentation/netlink/specs/rt_link.yaml \
           --do getlink --json '{"ifi-index": 7}'

And examine the output (heavily snipped to show relevant fields):

 'stats': {
           'multicast': 3739197,
           'rx-bytes': 1201525399,
           'rx-packets': 56807158,
           'tx-bytes': 492404458,
           'tx-packets': 1200285371,

 'stats64': {
             'multicast': 3739197,
             'rx-bytes': 35561263767,
             'rx-packets': 56807158,
             'tx-bytes': 666212335338,
             'tx-packets': 1200285371,

The stats.py test prior to this patch was using the 'stats' structure
above, which matches the failure output on my system.

Comparing side by side, rx-bytes and tx-bytes, and getting ethtool -S
output:

rx-bytes stats:    1201525399
rx-bytes stats64: 35561263767
rx-bytes ethtool: 36203402638

tx-bytes stats:      492404458
tx-bytes stats64: 666212335338
tx-bytes ethtool: 666215360113

Note that the above was taken from a system with an mlx5 NIC, which only
exposes ndo_get_stats64.

Based on the ethtool output and qstat output, it appears that stats.py
should be updated to use the 'stats64' structure for accurate
comparisons when packet/byte counters get very large.

To confirm that this was not related to the qstats code I was iterating
on, I booted a kernel without my driver changes and re-ran the test
which shows the qstats are skipped (as they don't exist for mlx5):

NETIF=eth0 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py
KTAP version 1
1..4
ok 1 stats.check_pause
ok 2 stats.check_fec
ok 3 stats.pkt_byte_sum # SKIP qstats not supported by the device
ok 4 stats.qstat_by_ifindex # SKIP No ifindex supports qstats

But, fetching the stats using the CLI

$ ./cli.py --spec ../../../Documentation/netlink/specs/rt_link.yaml \
           --do getlink --json '{"ifi-index": 7}'

Shows the same issue (heavily snipped for relevant fields only):

 'stats': {
           'multicast': 105489,
           'rx-bytes': 530879526,
           'rx-packets': 751415,
           'tx-bytes': 2510191396,
           'tx-packets': 27700323,
 'stats64': {
             'multicast': 105489,
             'rx-bytes': 530879526,
             'rx-packets': 751415,
             'tx-bytes': 15395093284,
             'tx-packets': 27700323,

Comparing side by side with ethtool -S on the unmodified mlx5 driver:

tx-bytes stats:    2510191396
tx-bytes stats64: 15395093284
tx-bytes ethtool: 17718435810

Fixes: f0e6c86e4bab ("testing: net-drv: add a driver test for stats reporting")
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py
index 7a7b16b180e2..820b8e0a22c6 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/stats.py
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ def pkt_byte_sum(cfg) -> None:
         return 0
 
     for _ in range(10):
-        rtstat = rtnl.getlink({"ifi-index": cfg.ifindex})['stats']
+        rtstat = rtnl.getlink({"ifi-index": cfg.ifindex})['stats64']
         if stat_cmp(rtstat, qstat) < 0:
             raise Exception("RTNL stats are lower, fetched later")
         qstat = get_qstat(cfg)
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-05-20 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-20 23:58 Joe Damato [this message]
2024-05-23  8:40 ` [PATCH net] testing: net-drv: use stats64 for testing patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240520235850.190041-1-jdamato@fastly.com \
    --to=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nalramli@fastly.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.