From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/7] bpf: pass bpf_struct_ops_link to callbacks in bpf_struct_ops.
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 15:51:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240521225121.770930-2-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240521225121.770930-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
Pass an additional pointer of bpf_struct_ops_link to callback function reg,
unreg, and update provided by subsystems defined in bpf_struct_ops. A
bpf_struct_ops_map can be registered for multiple links. Passing a pointer
of bpf_struct_ops_link helps subsystems to distinguish them.
This pointer will be used in the later patches to let the subsystem
initiate a detachment on a link that was registered to it previously.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 6 +++---
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 10 +++++-----
net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c | 4 ++--
net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 6 +++---
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c | 4 ++--
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 6 +++---
6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 90094400cc63..b600767ebe02 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1730,9 +1730,9 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops {
int (*init_member)(const struct btf_type *t,
const struct btf_member *member,
void *kdata, const void *udata);
- int (*reg)(void *kdata);
- void (*unreg)(void *kdata);
- int (*update)(void *kdata, void *old_kdata);
+ int (*reg)(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link);
+ void (*unreg)(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link);
+ int (*update)(void *kdata, void *old_kdata, struct bpf_link *link);
int (*validate)(void *kdata);
void *cfi_stubs;
struct module *owner;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 86c7884abaf8..1542dded7489 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
goto unlock;
}
- err = st_ops->reg(kdata);
+ err = st_ops->reg(kdata, NULL);
if (likely(!err)) {
/* This refcnt increment on the map here after
* 'st_ops->reg()' is secure since the state of the
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_TOBEFREE);
switch (prev_state) {
case BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE:
- st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->unreg(&st_map->kvalue.data);
+ st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->unreg(&st_map->kvalue.data, NULL);
bpf_map_put(map);
return 0;
case BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_TOBEFREE:
@@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_map_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
/* st_link->map can be NULL if
* bpf_struct_ops_link_create() fails to register.
*/
- st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->unreg(&st_map->kvalue.data);
+ st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->unreg(&st_map->kvalue.data, link);
bpf_map_put(&st_map->map);
}
kfree(st_link);
@@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_link_update(struct bpf_link *link, struct bpf_map
goto err_out;
}
- err = st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->update(st_map->kvalue.data, old_st_map->kvalue.data);
+ err = st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->update(st_map->kvalue.data, old_st_map->kvalue.data, link);
if (err)
goto err_out;
@@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
if (err)
goto err_out;
- err = st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->reg(st_map->kvalue.data);
+ err = st_map->st_ops_desc->st_ops->reg(st_map->kvalue.data, &link->link);
if (err) {
bpf_link_cleanup(&link_primer);
link = NULL;
diff --git a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
index 891cdf61c65a..3ea52b05adfb 100644
--- a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
+++ b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
@@ -272,12 +272,12 @@ static int bpf_dummy_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
-static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata)
+static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
-static void bpf_dummy_unreg(void *kdata)
+static void bpf_dummy_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
}
diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index 18227757ec0c..3f88d0961e5b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -260,17 +260,17 @@ static int bpf_tcp_ca_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,
return 0;
}
-static int bpf_tcp_ca_reg(void *kdata)
+static int bpf_tcp_ca_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
return tcp_register_congestion_control(kdata);
}
-static void bpf_tcp_ca_unreg(void *kdata)
+static void bpf_tcp_ca_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
tcp_unregister_congestion_control(kdata);
}
-static int bpf_tcp_ca_update(void *kdata, void *old_kdata)
+static int bpf_tcp_ca_update(void *kdata, void *old_kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
return tcp_update_congestion_control(kdata, old_kdata);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
index b1dd889d5d7d..948eb3962732 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_test_no_cfi/bpf_test_no_cfi.c
@@ -22,12 +22,12 @@ static int dummy_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
return 0;
}
-static int dummy_reg(void *kdata)
+static int dummy_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
return 0;
}
-static void dummy_unreg(void *kdata)
+static void dummy_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index 2a18bd320e92..0a09732cde4b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_testmod_verifier_ops = {
.is_valid_access = bpf_testmod_ops_is_valid_access,
};
-static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata)
+static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
struct bpf_testmod_ops *ops = kdata;
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static int bpf_dummy_reg(void *kdata)
return 0;
}
-static void bpf_dummy_unreg(void *kdata)
+static void bpf_dummy_unreg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
}
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_bpf_testmod_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
};
-static int bpf_dummy_reg2(void *kdata)
+static int bpf_dummy_reg2(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
{
struct bpf_testmod_ops2 *ops = kdata;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-21 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-21 22:51 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/7] Notify user space when a struct_ops object is detached/unregistered Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21 22:51 ` Kui-Feng Lee [this message]
2024-05-21 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/7] bpf: enable detaching links of struct_ops objects Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 18:09 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-23 18:28 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/7] bpf: support epoll from bpf struct_ops links Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 17:23 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-23 18:24 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 18:34 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-23 19:03 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-23 19:10 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-05-23 19:28 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/7] bpf: export bpf_link_inc_not_zero Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/7] selftests/bpf: test struct_ops with epoll Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/7] selftests/bpf: detach a struct_ops link from the subsystem managing it Kui-Feng Lee
2024-05-21 22:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 7/7] selftests/bpf: make sure bpf_testmod handling racing link destroying well Kui-Feng Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240521225121.770930-2-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.