From: Alina Yu <alina_yu@richtek.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<cy_huang@richtek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add specified fixed LDO VOUT property
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 17:45:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240522094524.GA21859@linuxcarl2.richtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b094ce68-9ce2-411d-99f2-1f143e4c3347@linaro.org>
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 11:27:06AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/05/2024 11:03, Alina Yu wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:34:02PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 16/05/2024 11:20, Alina Yu wrote:
> >>> As the fixed voltage for the LDO is outside the range of the adjustable voltage mode,
> >>> the constraints for this scenario are not suitable to represent both modes.
> >>> Therefore, A property is added to specify the fixed LDO VOUT.
> >>>
> >>> Examples of fixed LDO VOUT and adjustable LDO VOUT is also added to this version.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alina Yu <alina_yu@richtek.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> This is a v1 but I am pretty sure I saw it somewhere and there was
> >> already some sort of discussion. Confused... :(
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
> >
> > The discussion regarding this matter took place during v2 and v3.
>
> So in the future?
Based on the previous discussion, it is scheduled to be included in the linux-next tree.
Will we start a further discussions on this topic?
>
> > Due to the fixed LDO VOUT being outside the range of the adjustable one,
> > a special-use property has been added to avoid overusing the constraints.
>
> Hm, why exactly this is not a bool property? What are the benefits?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
As only the user will know the exact fixed voltage,
the property is defined as a u32 to allow user customization and decision-making.
Thanks,
Alina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-16 9:20 [PATCH 0/2] Add specified fixed LDO VOUT propery Alina Yu
2024-05-16 9:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] regulator: rtq2208: Add fixed LDO VOUT property and check that matches the constraints Alina Yu
2024-05-27 13:00 ` Mark Brown
2024-05-28 6:07 ` Alina Yu
2024-05-29 6:41 ` Alina Yu
2024-05-16 9:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add specified fixed LDO VOUT property Alina Yu
2024-05-16 12:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-05-22 9:03 ` Alina Yu
2024-05-22 9:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-05-22 9:45 ` Alina Yu [this message]
2024-05-22 11:35 ` Mark Brown
2024-05-22 13:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240522094524.GA21859@linuxcarl2.richtek.com \
--to=alina_yu@richtek.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cy_huang@richtek.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.