All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henry Wang <xin.wang2@amd.com>
To: <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Henry Wang <xin.wang2@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/9] xen/arm: Support device detachment from domains
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 15:40:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240523074040.1611264-8-xin.wang2@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240523074040.1611264-1-xin.wang2@amd.com>

Similarly as the device attachment from DT overlay to domain, this
commit implements the device detachment from domain. The DOMCTL
XEN_DOMCTL_dt_overlay op is extended to have the operation
XEN_DOMCTL_DT_OVERLAY_DETACH. The detachment of the device is
implemented by unmapping the IRQ and IOMMU resources. Note that with
these changes, the device de-registration from the IOMMU driver should
only happen at the time when the DT overlay is removed from the Xen
device tree.

Signed-off-by: Henry Wang <xin.wang2@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <fnu.vikram@xilinx.com>
---
v4:
- Split the original patch, only do device detachment from domain.
---
 xen/common/dt-overlay.c     | 243 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 xen/include/public/domctl.h |   3 +-
 2 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/common/dt-overlay.c b/xen/common/dt-overlay.c
index 1087f9b502..693b6e4777 100644
--- a/xen/common/dt-overlay.c
+++ b/xen/common/dt-overlay.c
@@ -392,24 +392,100 @@ find_track_entry_from_tracker(const void *overlay_fdt,
     return entry;
 }
 
+static int remove_irq(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, void *data)
+{
+    struct domain *d = data;
+    int rc = 0;
+
+    /*
+     * IRQ should always have access unless there are duplication of
+     * of irqs in device tree. There are few cases of xen device tree
+     * where there are duplicate interrupts for the same node.
+     */
+    if (!irq_access_permitted(d, s))
+        return 0;
+    /*
+     * TODO: We don't handle shared IRQs for now. So, it is assumed that
+     * the IRQs was not shared with another domain.
+     */
+    rc = irq_deny_access(d, s);
+    if ( rc )
+    {
+        printk(XENLOG_ERR "unable to revoke access for irq %ld\n", s);
+        return rc;
+    }
+
+    rc = release_guest_irq(d, s);
+    if ( rc )
+    {
+        printk(XENLOG_ERR "unable to release irq %ld\n", s);
+        return rc;
+    }
+
+    return rc;
+}
+
+static int remove_all_irqs(struct rangeset *irq_ranges, struct domain *d)
+{
+    return rangeset_report_ranges(irq_ranges, 0, ~0UL, remove_irq, d);
+}
+
+static int remove_iomem(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, void *data)
+{
+    struct domain *d = data;
+    int rc = 0;
+    p2m_type_t t;
+    mfn_t mfn;
+
+    mfn = p2m_lookup(d, _gfn(s), &t);
+    if ( mfn_x(mfn) == 0 || mfn_x(mfn) == ~0UL )
+        return -EINVAL;
+
+    rc = iomem_deny_access(d, s, e);
+    if ( rc )
+    {
+        printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to remove %pd access to %#lx - %#lx\n",
+               d, s, e);
+        return rc;
+    }
+
+    rc = unmap_mmio_regions(d, _gfn(s), e - s, _mfn(s));
+    if ( rc )
+        return rc;
+
+    return rc;
+}
+
+static int remove_all_iomems(struct rangeset *iomem_ranges, struct domain *d)
+{
+    return rangeset_report_ranges(iomem_ranges, 0, ~0UL, remove_iomem, d);
+}
+
 /* Check if node itself can be removed and remove node from IOMMU. */
-static int remove_node_resources(struct dt_device_node *device_node)
+static int remove_node_resources(struct dt_device_node *device_node,
+                                 struct domain *d)
 {
     int rc = 0;
     unsigned int len;
     domid_t domid;
 
-    domid = dt_device_used_by(device_node);
+    if ( !d )
+    {
+        domid = dt_device_used_by(device_node);
 
-    dt_dprintk("Checking if node %s is used by any domain\n",
-               device_node->full_name);
+        dt_dprintk("Checking if node %s is used by any domain\n",
+                   device_node->full_name);
 
-    /* Remove the node if only it's assigned to hardware domain or domain io. */
-    if ( domid != hardware_domain->domain_id && domid != DOMID_IO )
-    {
-        printk(XENLOG_ERR "Device %s is being used by domain %u. Removing nodes failed\n",
-               device_node->full_name, domid);
-        return -EINVAL;
+        /*
+         * We also check if device is assigned to DOMID_IO as when a domain
+         * is destroyed device is assigned to DOMID_IO.
+         */
+        if ( domid != DOMID_IO )
+        {
+            printk(XENLOG_ERR "Device %s is being assigned to %u. Device is assigned to %d\n",
+                   device_node->full_name, DOMID_IO, domid);
+            return -EINVAL;
+        }
     }
 
     /* Check if iommu property exists. */
@@ -417,9 +493,12 @@ static int remove_node_resources(struct dt_device_node *device_node)
     {
         if ( dt_device_is_protected(device_node) )
         {
-            rc = iommu_remove_dt_device(device_node);
-            if ( rc < 0 )
-                return rc;
+            if ( !list_empty(&device_node->domain_list) )
+            {
+                rc = iommu_deassign_dt_device(d, device_node);
+                if ( rc < 0 )
+                    return rc;
+            }
         }
     }
 
@@ -428,7 +507,8 @@ static int remove_node_resources(struct dt_device_node *device_node)
 
 /* Remove all descendants from IOMMU. */
 static int
-remove_descendant_nodes_resources(const struct dt_device_node *device_node)
+remove_descendant_nodes_resources(const struct dt_device_node *device_node,
+                                  struct domain *d)
 {
     int rc = 0;
     struct dt_device_node *child_node;
@@ -438,12 +518,12 @@ remove_descendant_nodes_resources(const struct dt_device_node *device_node)
     {
         if ( child_node->child )
         {
-            rc = remove_descendant_nodes_resources(child_node);
+            rc = remove_descendant_nodes_resources(child_node, d);
             if ( rc )
                 return rc;
         }
 
-        rc = remove_node_resources(child_node);
+        rc = remove_node_resources(child_node, d);
         if ( rc )
             return rc;
     }
@@ -456,8 +536,7 @@ static int remove_nodes(const struct overlay_track *tracker)
 {
     int rc = 0;
     struct dt_device_node *overlay_node;
-    unsigned int j;
-    struct domain *d = hardware_domain;
+    unsigned int j, len;
 
     for ( j = 0; j < tracker->num_nodes; j++ )
     {
@@ -467,18 +546,15 @@ static int remove_nodes(const struct overlay_track *tracker)
 
         write_lock(&dt_host_lock);
 
-        rc = remove_descendant_nodes_resources(overlay_node);
-        if ( rc )
+        /* Check if iommu property exists. */
+        if ( dt_get_property(overlay_node, "iommus", &len) )
         {
-            write_unlock(&dt_host_lock);
-            return rc;
-        }
-
-        rc = remove_node_resources(overlay_node);
-        if ( rc )
-        {
-            write_unlock(&dt_host_lock);
-            return rc;
+            if ( dt_device_is_protected(overlay_node) )
+            {
+                rc = iommu_remove_dt_device(overlay_node);
+                if ( rc < 0 )
+                    return rc;
+            }
         }
 
         dt_dprintk("Removing node: %s\n", overlay_node->full_name);
@@ -493,22 +569,6 @@ static int remove_nodes(const struct overlay_track *tracker)
         write_unlock(&dt_host_lock);
     }
 
-    /* Remove IRQ access. */
-    if ( tracker->irq_ranges )
-    {
-        rc = rangeset_consume_ranges(tracker->irq_ranges, irq_remove_cb, d);
-        if ( rc )
-            return rc;
-    }
-
-   /* Remove mmio access. */
-    if ( tracker->iomem_ranges )
-    {
-        rc = rangeset_consume_ranges(tracker->iomem_ranges, iomem_remove_cb, d);
-        if ( rc )
-            return rc;
-    }
-
     return rc;
 }
 
@@ -534,7 +594,6 @@ static long handle_remove_overlay_nodes(const void *overlay_fdt,
     {
         rc = -EINVAL;
         goto out;
-
     }
 
     rc = remove_nodes(entry);
@@ -552,9 +611,6 @@ static long handle_remove_overlay_nodes(const void *overlay_fdt,
 
     xfree(entry->nodes_address);
 
-    rangeset_destroy(entry->irq_ranges);
-    rangeset_destroy(entry->iomem_ranges);
-
     xfree(entry);
 
  out:
@@ -840,6 +896,88 @@ static long handle_add_overlay_nodes(void *overlay_fdt,
     return rc;
 }
 
+static long handle_detach_overlay_nodes(struct domain *d,
+                                        const void *overlay_fdt,
+                                        uint32_t overlay_fdt_size)
+{
+    int rc;
+    unsigned int j;
+    struct overlay_track *entry;
+
+    rc = check_overlay_fdt(overlay_fdt, overlay_fdt_size);
+    if ( rc )
+        return rc;
+
+    spin_lock(&overlay_lock);
+
+    entry = find_track_entry_from_tracker(overlay_fdt, overlay_fdt_size);
+    if ( entry == NULL )
+    {
+        rc = -EINVAL;
+        goto out;
+    }
+
+    for ( j = 0; j < entry->num_nodes; j++ )
+    {
+        struct dt_device_node *overlay_node;
+
+        overlay_node = (struct dt_device_node *)entry->nodes_address[j];
+        if ( overlay_node == NULL )
+        {
+            rc = -EINVAL;
+            goto out;
+        }
+
+        write_lock(&dt_host_lock);
+        rc = remove_descendant_nodes_resources(overlay_node, d);
+        if ( rc )
+        {
+            write_unlock(&dt_host_lock);
+            goto out;
+        }
+
+        rc = remove_node_resources(overlay_node, d);
+        if ( rc )
+        {
+            write_unlock(&dt_host_lock);
+            goto out;
+        }
+        write_unlock(&dt_host_lock);
+
+        rc = remove_all_irqs(entry->irq_ranges, d);
+        if ( rc )
+            goto out;
+
+        rc = remove_all_iomems(entry->iomem_ranges, d);
+        if ( rc )
+            goto out;
+    }
+
+    /* Remove IRQ access. */
+    if ( entry->irq_ranges )
+    {
+        rc = rangeset_consume_ranges(entry->irq_ranges, irq_remove_cb, d);
+        if ( rc )
+            goto out;
+    }
+
+    /* Remove mmio access. */
+    if ( entry->iomem_ranges )
+    {
+        rc = rangeset_consume_ranges(entry->iomem_ranges, iomem_remove_cb, d);
+        if ( rc )
+            goto out;
+    }
+
+    rangeset_destroy(entry->irq_ranges);
+    rangeset_destroy(entry->iomem_ranges);
+
+ out:
+    spin_unlock(&overlay_lock);
+
+    return rc;
+}
+
 static long handle_attach_overlay_nodes(struct domain *d,
                                         const void *overlay_fdt,
                                         uint32_t overlay_fdt_size)
@@ -956,7 +1094,8 @@ long dt_overlay_domctl(struct domain *d, struct xen_domctl_dt_overlay *op)
     long ret;
     void *overlay_fdt;
 
-    if ( op->overlay_op != XEN_DOMCTL_DT_OVERLAY_ATTACH )
+    if ( op->overlay_op != XEN_DOMCTL_DT_OVERLAY_ATTACH &&
+         op->overlay_op != XEN_DOMCTL_DT_OVERLAY_DETACH )
         return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
     if ( op->overlay_fdt_size == 0 || op->overlay_fdt_size > KB(500) )
@@ -979,7 +1118,9 @@ long dt_overlay_domctl(struct domain *d, struct xen_domctl_dt_overlay *op)
         return -EFAULT;
     }
 
-    if ( op->overlay_op == XEN_DOMCTL_DT_OVERLAY_ATTACH )
+    if ( op->overlay_op == XEN_DOMCTL_DT_OVERLAY_DETACH )
+        ret = handle_detach_overlay_nodes(d, overlay_fdt, op->overlay_fdt_size);
+    else
         ret = handle_attach_overlay_nodes(d, overlay_fdt, op->overlay_fdt_size);
 
     xfree(overlay_fdt);
diff --git a/xen/include/public/domctl.h b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
index ac3c2a7c4c..e91f743fa4 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
@@ -1195,7 +1195,8 @@ struct xen_domctl_dt_overlay {
     XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_64(const_void) overlay_fdt;  /* IN: overlay fdt. */
     uint32_t overlay_fdt_size;              /* IN: Overlay dtb size. */
 #define XEN_DOMCTL_DT_OVERLAY_ATTACH                1
-    uint8_t overlay_op;                     /* IN: Attach. */
+#define XEN_DOMCTL_DT_OVERLAY_DETACH                2
+    uint8_t overlay_op;                     /* IN: Attach/Detach. */
     uint8_t pad[3];                         /* IN: Must be zero. */
 };
 #endif
-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-23  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23  7:40 [PATCH v4 0/9] Remaining patches for dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo Henry Wang
2024-05-23  7:40 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] tools/xl: Correct the help information and exit code of the dt-overlay command Henry Wang
2024-05-24  0:55   ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-05-23  7:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] xen/arm, doc: Add a DT property to specify IOMMU for Dom0less domUs Henry Wang
2024-05-23 21:23   ` Julien Grall
2024-05-23  7:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] tools/arm: Introduce the "nr_spis" xl config entry Henry Wang
2024-05-23 23:05   ` Julien Grall
2024-05-24  2:19     ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-05-23  7:40 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] xen/arm/gic: Allow adding interrupt to running VMs Henry Wang
2024-05-23 21:27   ` Julien Grall
2024-05-23  7:40 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] xen/arm: Add XEN_DOMCTL_dt_overlay and device attachment to domains Henry Wang
2024-05-23 21:55   ` Julien Grall
2024-05-24  2:19     ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-05-23  7:40 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] xen/arm/gic: Allow removing interrupt to running VMs Henry Wang
2024-05-23  7:40 ` Henry Wang [this message]
2024-05-23 22:42   ` [PATCH v4 7/9] xen/arm: Support device detachment from domains Julien Grall
2024-05-23  7:40 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] tools: Introduce the "xl dt-overlay {attach,detach}" commands Henry Wang
2024-05-23 23:11   ` Julien Grall
2024-05-24  2:19     ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-05-23  7:40 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] docs: Add device tree overlay documentation Henry Wang
2024-05-23 22:48   ` Julien Grall
2024-05-24  2:19     ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-05-23 21:29 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Remaining patches for dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240523074040.1611264-8-xin.wang2@amd.com \
    --to=xin.wang2@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.