From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A7C5A94C for ; Thu, 23 May 2024 14:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716475946; cv=none; b=bOReyyrssKVtoA5+zQXsjkQlQNnWsmztXODvelwDRS+1BrJN561jwh4y6rhjhB8BYVihoSK5T8CumzLKvZHGN36jzj++WasJEIwftyp4ZCDnpn7i/YbVqgrvn2HT0Fe6BVNHNc1jfr7xe3KcaLRIJI4tmDOJ1lDFKLEWed8EitA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716475946; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QoapCTTvyS29Itm5R9nWjGnlbCqhIU/ZkRz0/1mM4wc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EI3R6+kgp+SToIprC6yHiyAIGn29hOP+BK+BH6tQasBr8rNB/oiHPqrbf3RFhiY3m2ZEBFYfk6tqFTfsHDW4rLfrW1tXhz062WlEnB1LhM6Y7yuhu4zPD0DGiU4dW5SCkYoaXZmT5zoAq1cuoBt7CMvvCo85GL7RTIpAinRHUBE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=aMK4Vvgc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="aMK4Vvgc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1716475946; x=1748011946; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QoapCTTvyS29Itm5R9nWjGnlbCqhIU/ZkRz0/1mM4wc=; b=aMK4VvgcBc6p5xNe0/tMATDeIllGMUVyNBHPzlS6hzNNUKwwPrrrWTBJ gL7KjU8s4orrJxecq/cPuFvcfGXbADwh84ZRBBTymLAjCc3o0Wl3F81dC ykh6Z0tWAXukFrr69WnfqSyVFvVIRFxq7JMkcTh374EnALCQKmPxVLS2d InZjUmVEjxWQTeH+uAFnv8SSUR7xUrwWFiuHZ/4lGwZ+I2c+kyfxjBvsV nQSi2kcG0jR8oCF/b8KcekM4LtxnpY9nywrGv0tlzfheK4FgPa2a5tYyh bbKKqWAik0+mheZQUrUOvkD+kbNDxGnxh2xA7vaQ72VfjHAYngb1fj+/X g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: COyBd+9KTIKLLMgSImyBzw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CAILcMvQSOOjObUbT+UNjg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11081"; a="12737661" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,182,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="12737661" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 May 2024 07:52:25 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: u+j5GfIRTiqlrRm8GEP1Gw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: w2AvpdafSXe0podTOE1tlg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,182,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="64525511" Received: from mtkaczyk-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.112.252]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 May 2024 07:52:24 -0700 Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 16:52:18 +0200 From: Mariusz Tkaczyk To: Xiao Ni Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, heinzm@redhat.com, ncroxon@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/19] mdadm/tests: test enhance Message-ID: <20240523165218.000040bc@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240522085056.54818-1-xni@redhat.com> <20240522085056.54818-5-xni@redhat.com> <20240523162614.000049be@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 23 May 2024 22:39:16 +0800 Xiao Ni wrote: > > Hi Xiao, > > control and restore functions are not used or in this patch. if you want to > > use them in next patches please highlight it in description. > > Beside that LGTM. > > Hi Mariusz > > The record_system_speed_limit and control_system_speed_limit are used > in this patch. restore_system_speed_limit has been used before my > patch set already. So I don't need to change it. > Thanks for fast response. The patches are not pushed yet, I will wait. I looped the code and don't see usages. You just declared them,where they are used? Thanks, Mariusz