From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,xuyu@linux.alibaba.com,stable@vger.kernel.org,shy828301@gmail.com,osalvador@suse.de,nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,david@redhat.com,anshuman.khandual@arm.com,linmiaohe@huawei.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-hotfixes-stable] mm-huge_memory-dont-unpoison-huge_zero_folio.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 11:55:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240524185546.559BDC2BD11@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/huge_memory: don't unpoison huge_zero_folio
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-huge_memory-dont-unpoison-huge_zero_folio.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Subject: mm/huge_memory: don't unpoison huge_zero_folio
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 20:26:08 +0800
When I did memory failure tests recently, below panic occurs:
kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1135!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 9 PID: 137 Comm: kswapd1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-00491-gd5ce28f156fe-dirty #14
RIP: 0010:shrink_huge_zero_page_scan+0x168/0x1a0
RSP: 0018:ffff9933c6c57bd0 EFLAGS: 00000246
RAX: 000000000000003e RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88f61fc5c9c8
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff88f61fc5c9c0
RBP: ffffcd7c446b0000 R08: ffffffff9a9405f0 R09: 0000000000005492
R10: 00000000000030ea R11: ffffffff9a9405f0 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88e703c4ac00
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88f61fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000055f4da6e9878 CR3: 0000000c71048000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
do_shrink_slab+0x14f/0x6a0
shrink_slab+0xca/0x8c0
shrink_node+0x2d0/0x7d0
balance_pgdat+0x33a/0x720
kswapd+0x1f3/0x410
kthread+0xd5/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
Modules linked in: mce_inject hwpoison_inject
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:shrink_huge_zero_page_scan+0x168/0x1a0
RSP: 0018:ffff9933c6c57bd0 EFLAGS: 00000246
RAX: 000000000000003e RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88f61fc5c9c8
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff88f61fc5c9c0
RBP: ffffcd7c446b0000 R08: ffffffff9a9405f0 R09: 0000000000005492
R10: 00000000000030ea R11: ffffffff9a9405f0 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88e703c4ac00
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88f61fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000055f4da6e9878 CR3: 0000000c71048000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
The root cause is that HWPoison flag will be set for huge_zero_folio
without increasing the folio refcnt. But then unpoison_memory() will
decrease the folio refcnt unexpectedly as it appears like a successfully
hwpoisoned folio leading to VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0) when
releasing huge_zero_folio.
Skip unpoisoning huge_zero_folio in unpoison_memory() to fix this issue.
We're not prepared to unpoison huge_zero_folio yet.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240516122608.22610-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Fixes: 478d134e9506 ("mm/huge_memory: do not overkill when splitting huge_zero_page")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Cc: Xu Yu <xuyu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c~mm-huge_memory-dont-unpoison-huge_zero_folio
+++ a/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -2546,6 +2546,13 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
goto unlock_mutex;
}
+ if (is_huge_zero_folio(folio)) {
+ unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: huge zero page is not supported %#lx\n",
+ pfn, &unpoison_rs);
+ ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto unlock_mutex;
+ }
+
if (!PageHWPoison(p)) {
unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: Page was already unpoisoned %#lx\n",
pfn, &unpoison_rs);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from linmiaohe@huawei.com are
reply other threads:[~2024-05-24 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240524185546.559BDC2BD11@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xuyu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.