From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 316046AB6 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717260354; cv=none; b=GCDGxVLA6abcNChLcfW8dqqR/6lM/l241vWuRl9Ka0KmEzRHFqMRf+9PZ66Qonv4h7y8rCtGlrypCVYDYaj1OzCHgmQ/rFbmonb/hyF9qoCot1N3nhpilf9jg5fh7Kp7ZRm3lUGHe9E1+wCnnjPWMVZymi6yWqJ7dMSq/SbZc58= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717260354; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QsRVKC5X0Fy1ZdgY1ujnQdVJ8ArUkDnTg/4MIkA28kY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Lm82pRgDoaVtGVYl/5BSLjUoj5dsmN04QPWpEUKgQVk+dleF3iZjxer8F2hMmCyMVqkn9Xdl/kNAvBRF24a9inWuTb29p0uwvCFtirmUfsTfkSgM43iNMzGcjPSuUL8TNtRcT3njehuwSbaqWz6EgKwAEBtVpXxoIkCnPnuCMq8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=WgqXHu1O; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WgqXHu1O" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1717260352; x=1748796352; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=QsRVKC5X0Fy1ZdgY1ujnQdVJ8ArUkDnTg/4MIkA28kY=; b=WgqXHu1Oxt9y04yV5N3PMuBdRu2LKe9k9SH0AW72R52vKeCirLmCsh5j C3gg6jy9XGChYOkbGLjEAe/w0bG+jc7R8mdNnIqjjizZOgzhnZyzeHPgM Fe8zBmYi80UBSiG49jTnIt1lzA9eLYV7EG5QAGq9xmxFLtdO9ijzaV0Au kAz6HQ/xouBlGwLWDv2bXn87xKq6533Vd5rm/nSHdc5tNMFcf/leg176Q Un8zhSiZDHNnYl+BkFdzvkrxNsBETsdhM3NJRsjIMGVwnyy1LicWe5AWf 4k927ODTL6rdE0WMg5r0fxsOOEkKIvNx5hes/b+X3NsO25kLpNjeccTCC g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: D3gV+iKWQ6KwStE19kod8w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ToTcydSxSAWBGErc9AxQPw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11090"; a="14020421" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,207,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="14020421" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jun 2024 09:45:51 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: t+peFic6T9O1huCTi/zuPg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: t5A02n+ySlWAkphnI5PZ2g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,207,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="36902441" Received: from unknown (HELO 0610945e7d16) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2024 09:45:50 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 0610945e7d16 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sDRrW-000J8B-2v; Sat, 01 Jun 2024 16:45:46 +0000 Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 00:44:47 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 9/9] pci: pcie: portdrv: aer: Switch to auxiliary_bus Message-ID: <202406020045.vBgvv8Tw-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240529164103.31671-10-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240529164103.31671-10-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Hi Jonathan, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on pci/next] [also build test WARNING on pci/for-linus driver-core/driver-core-testing driver-core/driver-core-next driver-core/driver-core-linus cxl/next linus/master v6.10-rc1 next-20240531] [cannot apply to cxl/pending] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jonathan-Cameron/pci-pcie-Drop-priv_data-from-struct-pcie_device-and-use-dev_get-set_drvdata-instead/20240530-004705 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240529164103.31671-10-Jonathan.Cameron%40huawei.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH 9/9] pci: pcie: portdrv: aer: Switch to auxiliary_bus config: x86_64-randconfig-122-20240601 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240602/202406020045.vBgvv8Tw-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-13 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240602/202406020045.vBgvv8Tw-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406020045.vBgvv8Tw-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c:210:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'pcie_portdrv_aer_ida' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/mmzone.h, include/linux/gfp.h, include/linux/xarray.h, ...): include/linux/page-flags.h:240:46: sparse: sparse: self-comparison always evaluates to false include/linux/page-flags.h:240:46: sparse: sparse: self-comparison always evaluates to false vim +/pcie_portdrv_aer_ida +210 drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv.c 209 > 210 DEFINE_IDA(pcie_portdrv_aer_ida); 211 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki