From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, paul@paul-moore.com
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
ast@kernel.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, renauld@google.com, revest@chromium.org,
song@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:58:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202406060856.95CBD48@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240516003524.143243-1-kpsingh@kernel.org>
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:35:19AM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
> This series is a respin of the RFC proposed by Paul Renauld (renauld@google.com)
> and Brendan Jackman (jackmanb@google.com) [1]
>
> # Performance improvement
>
> With this patch-set some syscalls with lots of LSM hooks in their path
> benefitted at an average of ~3% and I/O and Pipe based system calls benefitting
> the most.
Hi Paul,
With the merge window closed now, can we please land this in -next so we
can get any glitches found/hammered out with maximal time before the
next merge window?
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-16 0:35 [PATCH v12 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls KP Singh
2024-05-16 0:35 ` [PATCH v12 1/5] kernel: Add helper macros for loop unrolling KP Singh
2024-05-17 8:03 ` John Johansen
2024-05-16 0:35 ` [PATCH v12 2/5] security: Count the LSMs enabled at compile time KP Singh
2024-05-17 8:09 ` John Johansen
2024-05-16 0:35 ` [PATCH v12 3/5] security: Replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls KP Singh
2024-06-27 20:28 ` Jonathan Corbet
2024-06-29 8:28 ` KP Singh
2024-05-16 0:35 ` [PATCH v12 4/5] security: Update non standard hooks to use " KP Singh
2024-05-16 0:35 ` [PATCH v12 5/5] bpf: Only enable BPF LSM hooks when an LSM program is attached KP Singh
2024-06-11 1:05 ` Paul Moore
2024-06-29 8:13 ` KP Singh
2024-07-01 23:40 ` Paul Moore
2024-05-18 6:01 ` [PATCH v12 0/5] Reduce overhead of LSMs with static calls Tetsuo Handa
2024-06-06 15:58 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-06-06 16:36 ` Paul Moore
2024-06-06 18:07 ` Kees Cook
2024-06-06 20:07 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202406060856.95CBD48@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=renauld@google.com \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.