From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, yunying.sun@intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] perf/x86/uncore: Apply the unit control RB tree to MSR uncore units
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:16:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240610201619.884021-6-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240610201619.884021-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The unit control RB tree has the unit control and unit ID information
for all the MSR units. Use them to replace the box_ctl and
uncore_msr_box_ctl() to get an accurate unit control address for MSR
uncore units.
Add intel_generic_uncore_assign_hw_event(), which utilizes the accurate
unit control address from the unit control RB tree to calculate the
config_base and event_base.
The unit id related information should be retrieved from the unit
control RB tree as well.
Tested-by: Yunying Sun <yunying.sun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 3 ++
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.h | 2 +
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 16 +++++---
4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index 27a0cda5cc91..bdb253a1bc3b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ static void uncore_assign_hw_event(struct intel_uncore_box *box,
return;
}
+ if (intel_generic_uncore_assign_hw_event(event, box))
+ return;
+
hwc->config_base = uncore_event_ctl(box, hwc->idx);
hwc->event_base = uncore_perf_ctr(box, hwc->idx);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
index ece761c9f17a..076ec1efe9cc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
@@ -499,19 +499,31 @@ static const struct attribute_group generic_uncore_format_group = {
.attrs = generic_uncore_formats_attr,
};
+static u64 intel_generic_uncore_box_ctl(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
+{
+ struct intel_uncore_discovery_unit *unit;
+
+ unit = intel_uncore_find_discovery_unit(box->pmu->type->boxes,
+ -1, box->pmu->pmu_idx);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!unit))
+ return 0;
+
+ return unit->addr;
+}
+
void intel_generic_uncore_msr_init_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{
- wrmsrl(uncore_msr_box_ctl(box), GENERIC_PMON_BOX_CTL_INT);
+ wrmsrl(intel_generic_uncore_box_ctl(box), GENERIC_PMON_BOX_CTL_INT);
}
void intel_generic_uncore_msr_disable_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{
- wrmsrl(uncore_msr_box_ctl(box), GENERIC_PMON_BOX_CTL_FRZ);
+ wrmsrl(intel_generic_uncore_box_ctl(box), GENERIC_PMON_BOX_CTL_FRZ);
}
void intel_generic_uncore_msr_enable_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{
- wrmsrl(uncore_msr_box_ctl(box), 0);
+ wrmsrl(intel_generic_uncore_box_ctl(box), 0);
}
static void intel_generic_uncore_msr_enable_event(struct intel_uncore_box *box,
@@ -539,6 +551,31 @@ static struct intel_uncore_ops generic_uncore_msr_ops = {
.read_counter = uncore_msr_read_counter,
};
+bool intel_generic_uncore_assign_hw_event(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct intel_uncore_box *box)
+{
+ struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
+ u64 box_ctl;
+
+ if (!box->pmu->type->boxes)
+ return false;
+
+ if (box->pci_dev || box->io_addr) {
+ hwc->config_base = uncore_pci_event_ctl(box, hwc->idx);
+ hwc->event_base = uncore_pci_perf_ctr(box, hwc->idx);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ box_ctl = intel_generic_uncore_box_ctl(box);
+ if (!box_ctl)
+ return false;
+
+ hwc->config_base = box_ctl + box->pmu->type->event_ctl + hwc->idx;
+ hwc->event_base = box_ctl + box->pmu->type->perf_ctr + hwc->idx;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
void intel_generic_uncore_pci_init_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = box->pci_dev;
@@ -697,10 +734,12 @@ static bool uncore_update_uncore_type(enum uncore_access_type type_id,
switch (type_id) {
case UNCORE_ACCESS_MSR:
uncore->ops = &generic_uncore_msr_ops;
- uncore->perf_ctr = (unsigned int)type->box_ctrl + type->ctr_offset;
- uncore->event_ctl = (unsigned int)type->box_ctrl + type->ctl_offset;
+ uncore->perf_ctr = (unsigned int)type->ctr_offset;
+ uncore->event_ctl = (unsigned int)type->ctl_offset;
uncore->box_ctl = (unsigned int)type->box_ctrl;
uncore->msr_offsets = type->box_offset;
+ uncore->boxes = &type->units;
+ uncore->num_boxes = type->num_units;
break;
case UNCORE_ACCESS_PCI:
uncore->ops = &generic_uncore_pci_ops;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.h
index 96265cf1fc86..4a7a7c819d6f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.h
@@ -169,3 +169,5 @@ intel_uncore_generic_init_uncores(enum uncore_access_type type_id, int num_extra
int intel_uncore_find_discovery_unit_id(struct rb_root *units, int die,
unsigned int pmu_idx);
+bool intel_generic_uncore_assign_hw_event(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct intel_uncore_box *box);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
index 74b8b21e8990..8b1cabff7ee3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -5933,10 +5933,11 @@ static int spr_cha_hw_config(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *ev
struct hw_perf_event_extra *reg1 = &event->hw.extra_reg;
bool tie_en = !!(event->hw.config & SPR_CHA_PMON_CTL_TID_EN);
struct intel_uncore_type *type = box->pmu->type;
+ int id = intel_uncore_find_discovery_unit_id(type->boxes, -1, box->pmu->pmu_idx);
if (tie_en) {
reg1->reg = SPR_C0_MSR_PMON_BOX_FILTER0 +
- HSWEP_CBO_MSR_OFFSET * type->box_ids[box->pmu->pmu_idx];
+ HSWEP_CBO_MSR_OFFSET * id;
reg1->config = event->attr.config1 & SPR_CHA_PMON_BOX_FILTER_TID;
reg1->idx = 0;
}
@@ -6460,18 +6461,21 @@ uncore_find_type_by_id(struct intel_uncore_type **types, int type_id)
static int uncore_type_max_boxes(struct intel_uncore_type **types,
int type_id)
{
+ struct intel_uncore_discovery_unit *unit;
struct intel_uncore_type *type;
- int i, max = 0;
+ struct rb_node *node;
+ int max = 0;
type = uncore_find_type_by_id(types, type_id);
if (!type)
return 0;
- for (i = 0; i < type->num_boxes; i++) {
- if (type->box_ids[i] > max)
- max = type->box_ids[i];
- }
+ for (node = rb_first(type->boxes); node; node = rb_next(node)) {
+ unit = rb_entry(node, struct intel_uncore_discovery_unit, node);
+ if (unit->id > max)
+ max = unit->id;
+ }
return max + 1;
}
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 20:16 [PATCH 0/8] Support HBM and CXL PMON uncore counters kan.liang
2024-06-10 20:16 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf/x86/uncore: Save the unit control address of all units kan.liang
2024-06-10 22:40 ` Tim Chen
2024-06-12 14:49 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-12 17:08 ` Tim Chen
2024-06-12 17:33 ` Tim Chen
2024-06-12 19:25 ` Liang, Kan
2024-06-10 20:16 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf/x86/uncore: Support per PMU cpumask kan.liang
2024-06-10 20:16 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf/x86/uncore: Retrieve the unit ID from the unit control RB tree kan.liang
2024-06-10 20:16 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf/x86/uncore: Apply the unit control RB tree to MMIO uncore units kan.liang
2024-06-10 20:16 ` kan.liang [this message]
2024-06-10 20:16 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf/x86/uncore: Apply the unit control RB tree to PCI " kan.liang
2024-06-10 20:16 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf/x86/uncore: Cleanup unused unit structure kan.liang
2024-06-10 20:16 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Support HBM and CXL PMON counters kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240610201619.884021-6-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yunying.sun@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.