From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>
Cc: dvyukov@google.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de,
elver@google.com, glider@google.com, syzkaller@googlegroups.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kcov: don't lose track of remote references during softirqs
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:51:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240611115133.fa80466e924ad34ed4ad73cb@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240611133229.527822-1-nogikh@google.com>
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:32:29 +0200 Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com> wrote:
> In kcov_remote_start()/kcov_remote_stop(), we swap the previous KCOV
> metadata of the current task into a per-CPU variable. However, the
> kcov_mode_enabled(mode) check is not sufficient in the case of remote
> KCOV coverage: current->kcov_mode always remains KCOV_MODE_DISABLED
> for remote KCOV objects.
>
> If the original task that has invoked the KCOV_REMOTE_ENABLE ioctl
> happens to get interrupted and kcov_remote_start() is called, it
> ultimately leads to kcov_remote_stop() NOT restoring the original
> KCOV reference. So when the task exits, all registered remote KCOV
> handles remain active forever.
>
> Fix it by introducing a special kcov_mode that is assigned to the
> task that owns a KCOV remote object. It makes kcov_mode_enabled()
> return true and yet does not trigger coverage collection in
> __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() and write_comp_data().
What are the userspace visible effects of this bug? I *think* it's
just an efficiency thing, but how significant? In other words, should
we backport this fix?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-11 13:32 [PATCH] kcov: don't lose track of remote references during softirqs Aleksandr Nogikh
2024-06-11 13:33 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-06-11 18:51 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-06-12 10:11 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
2024-06-13 22:12 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-06-13 23:02 ` Andrey Konovalov
2024-06-14 17:13 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240611115133.fa80466e924ad34ed4ad73cb@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nogikh@google.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.