From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, russell.h.weight@intel.com,
ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com, wedsonaf@gmail.com,
boqun.feng@gmail.com, gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com,
benno.lossin@proton.me, a.hindborg@samsung.com,
aliceryhl@google.com, airlied@gmail.com,
fujita.tomonori@gmail.com, pstanner@redhat.com,
ajanulgu@redhat.com, lyude@redhat.com,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rust: add firmware abstractions
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:31:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024061128-provolone-coyness-1d3c@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240610180318.72152-3-dakr@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 08:02:28PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Add an abstraction around the kernels firmware API to request firmware
> images. The abstraction provides functions to access the firmware's size
> and backing buffer.
>
> The firmware is released once the abstraction instance is dropped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> ---
> rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h | 1 +
> rust/kernel/firmware.rs | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> rust/kernel/lib.rs | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 rust/kernel/firmware.rs
>
> diff --git a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> index ddb5644d4fd9..18a3f05115cb 100644
> --- a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> +++ b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <kunit/test.h>
> #include <linux/errname.h>
> #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> #include <linux/mdio.h>
> #include <linux/phy.h>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/firmware.rs b/rust/kernel/firmware.rs
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7ff4c325f670
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/rust/kernel/firmware.rs
> @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +//! Firmware abstraction
> +//!
> +//! C header: [`include/linux/firmware.h`](srctree/include/linux/firmware.h")
> +
> +use crate::{bindings, device::Device, error::Error, error::Result, str::CStr};
> +use core::ptr::NonNull;
> +
> +// One of the following: `bindings::request_firmware`, `bindings::firmware_request_nowarn`,
> +// `firmware_request_platform`, `bindings::request_firmware_direct`
> +type FwFunc =
> + unsafe extern "C" fn(*mut *const bindings::firmware, *const i8, *mut bindings::device) -> i32;
> +
> +/// Abstraction around a C `struct firmware`.
> +///
> +/// This is a simple abstraction around the C firmware API. Just like with the C API, firmware can
> +/// be requested. Once requested the abstraction provides direct access to the firmware buffer as
> +/// `&[u8]`. The firmware is released once [`Firmware`] is dropped.
> +///
> +/// # Invariants
> +///
> +/// The pointer is valid, and has ownership over the instance of `struct firmware`.
> +///
> +/// # Examples
> +///
> +/// ```
> +/// use kernel::firmware::Firmware;
> +///
> +/// let fw = Firmware::request("path/to/firmware.bin", dev.as_ref())?;
> +/// driver_load_firmware(fw.data());
> +/// ```
> +pub struct Firmware(NonNull<bindings::firmware>);
> +
> +impl Firmware {
> + fn request_internal(name: &CStr, dev: &Device, func: FwFunc) -> Result<Self> {
> + let mut fw: *mut bindings::firmware = core::ptr::null_mut();
> + let pfw: *mut *mut bindings::firmware = &mut fw;
> +
> + // SAFETY: `pfw` is a valid pointer to a NULL initialized `bindings::firmware` pointer.
> + // `name` and `dev` are valid as by their type invariants.
> + let ret = unsafe { func(pfw as _, name.as_char_ptr(), dev.as_raw()) };
> + if ret != 0 {
> + return Err(Error::from_errno(ret));
> + }
> +
> + // SAFETY: `func` not bailing out with a non-zero error code, guarantees that `fw` is a
> + // valid pointer to `bindings::firmware`.
> + Ok(Firmware(unsafe { NonNull::new_unchecked(fw) }))
> + }
> +
> + /// Send a firmware request and wait for it. See also `bindings::request_firmware`.
> + pub fn request(name: &CStr, dev: &Device) -> Result<Self> {
> + Self::request_internal(name, dev, bindings::request_firmware)
> + }
How does this handle when CONFIG_FW_LOADER is not enabled? Why are you
building these bindings if that option is not checked?
> +
> + /// Send a request for an optional firmware module. See also
> + /// `bindings::firmware_request_nowarn`.
> + pub fn request_nowarn(name: &CStr, dev: &Device) -> Result<Self> {
> + Self::request_internal(name, dev, bindings::firmware_request_nowarn)
> + }
> +
> + /// Send a request for a firmware with platform-fw fallback. See also
> + /// `bindings::firmware_request_platform`.
> + pub fn request_platform(name: &CStr, dev: &Device) -> Result<Self> {
> + Self::request_internal(name, dev, bindings::firmware_request_platform)
> + }
> +
> + /// Send a request for a firmware directly without usermode helper. See also
> + /// `bindings::request_firmware_direct`.
> + pub fn request_direct(name: &CStr, dev: &Device) -> Result<Self> {
> + Self::request_internal(name, dev, bindings::request_firmware_direct)
> + }
Why just these variants? Why not just add the ones that people actually
need instead of a random assortment like you choose here :)
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 18:02 [PATCH v2 0/2] Rust abstractions for Device & Firmware Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-10 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: add abstraction for struct device Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-10 18:38 ` Boqun Feng
2024-06-11 13:21 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-11 13:29 ` Greg KH
2024-06-11 16:13 ` Boqun Feng
2024-06-12 13:59 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-12 14:51 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-12 15:02 ` Greg KH
2024-06-12 15:35 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-12 15:50 ` Greg KH
2024-06-12 16:18 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-12 17:13 ` Greg KH
2024-06-12 17:43 ` Greg KH
2024-06-12 20:56 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-13 5:47 ` Greg KH
2024-06-13 12:22 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-13 20:18 ` Lyude Paul
2024-06-10 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] rust: add firmware abstractions Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-11 6:31 ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-06-11 13:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-06-11 13:44 ` Greg KH
2024-06-12 11:32 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-13 3:36 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024061128-provolone-coyness-1d3c@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=a.hindborg@samsung.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=ajanulgu@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=pstanner@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=russell.h.weight@intel.com \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wedsonaf@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.