Re: [PATCH 0/8] DAMON based tiered memory management for CXL memory

[SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>]

On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:27:26 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:17:31 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com> wrote:
> > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> > posted at [1].
> >
> > It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action
> > are made.  This patch series is about its implementation for physical
> > address space so that this scheme can be applied in system wide level.
> >
> > Changes from RFC v4:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/20240512175447.75943-1-sj@kernel.org
> >   1. Add usage and design documents
> >   2. Rename alloc_demote_folio to alloc_migrate_folio
> >   3. Add evaluation results with "demotion_enabled" true
> >   4. Rebase based on v6.10-rc3
> 
> Sorry for making confusion, I didn't add "PATCH v5" tag for this patch
> series so please ignore and see the resent one.

Thank you for clarifying this.

Nonetheless, I don't mine resetting the version number of a patchset after
dropping RFC.  Actually, I personally rather prefer resetting the version
number.  Anyway, I don't care that much.  Please use any way that you feel more
comfortable :)  Please just keep the number monotonically increase.


Thanks,
SJ

> 
> Honggyu