All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: nathan@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y] kbuild: Remove support for Clang's ThinLTO caching
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:33:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240613183322.1088226-1-nathan@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2024061340-troubling-automated-9989@gregkh>

commit aba091547ef6159d52471f42a3ef531b7b660ed8 upstream.

There is an issue in clang's ThinLTO caching (enabled for the kernel via
'--thinlto-cache-dir') with .incbin, which the kernel occasionally uses
to include data within the kernel, such as the .config file for
/proc/config.gz. For example, when changing the .config and rebuilding
vmlinux, the copy of .config in vmlinux does not match the copy of
.config in the build folder:

  $ echo 'CONFIG_LTO_NONE=n
  CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN=y
  CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y
  CONFIG_HEADERS_INSTALL=y' >kernel/configs/repro.config

  $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 LLVM=1 clean defconfig repro.config vmlinux
  ...

  $ grep CONFIG_HEADERS_INSTALL .config
  CONFIG_HEADERS_INSTALL=y

  $ scripts/extract-ikconfig vmlinux | grep CONFIG_HEADERS_INSTALL
  CONFIG_HEADERS_INSTALL=y

  $ scripts/config -d HEADERS_INSTALL

  $ make -kj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 LLVM=1 vmlinux
  ...
    UPD     kernel/config_data
    GZIP    kernel/config_data.gz
    CC      kernel/configs.o
  ...
    LD      vmlinux
  ...

  $ grep CONFIG_HEADERS_INSTALL .config
  # CONFIG_HEADERS_INSTALL is not set

  $ scripts/extract-ikconfig vmlinux | grep CONFIG_HEADERS_INSTALL
  CONFIG_HEADERS_INSTALL=y

Without '--thinlto-cache-dir' or when using full LTO, this issue does
not occur.

Benchmarking incremental builds on a few different machines with and
without the cache shows a 20% increase in incremental build time without
the cache when measured by touching init/main.c and running 'make all'.

ARCH=arm64 defconfig + CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN=y on an arm64 host:

  Benchmark 1: With ThinLTO cache
    Time (mean ± σ):     56.347 s ±  0.163 s    [User: 83.768 s, System: 24.661 s]
    Range (min … max):   56.109 s … 56.594 s    10 runs

  Benchmark 2: Without ThinLTO cache
    Time (mean ± σ):     67.740 s ±  0.479 s    [User: 718.458 s, System: 31.797 s]
    Range (min … max):   67.059 s … 68.556 s    10 runs

  Summary
    With ThinLTO cache ran
      1.20 ± 0.01 times faster than Without ThinLTO cache

ARCH=x86_64 defconfig + CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN=y on an x86_64 host:

  Benchmark 1: With ThinLTO cache
    Time (mean ± σ):     85.772 s ±  0.252 s    [User: 91.505 s, System: 8.408 s]
    Range (min … max):   85.447 s … 86.244 s    10 runs

  Benchmark 2: Without ThinLTO cache
    Time (mean ± σ):     103.833 s ±  0.288 s    [User: 232.058 s, System: 8.569 s]
    Range (min … max):   103.286 s … 104.124 s    10 runs

  Summary
    With ThinLTO cache ran
      1.21 ± 0.00 times faster than Without ThinLTO cache

While it is unfortunate to take this performance improvement off the
table, correctness is more important. If/when this is fixed in LLVM, it
can potentially be brought back in a conditional manner. Alternatively,
a developer can just disable LTO if doing incremental compiles quickly
is important, as a full compile cycle can still take over a minute even
with the cache and it is unlikely that LTO will result in functional
differences for a kernel change.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: dc5723b02e52 ("kbuild: add support for Clang LTO")
Reported-by: Yifan Hong <elsk@google.com>
Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/2021
Reported-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220327115526.cc4b0ff55fc53c97683c3e4d@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
[nathan: Address conflict in Makefile]
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
 Makefile | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index c5147f1c46f8..abe7ba05155b 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -980,7 +980,6 @@ endif
 ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG
 ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN
 CC_FLAGS_LTO	:= -flto=thin -fsplit-lto-unit
-KBUILD_LDFLAGS	+= --thinlto-cache-dir=$(extmod_prefix).thinlto-cache
 else
 CC_FLAGS_LTO	:= -flto
 endif
@@ -1588,7 +1587,7 @@ endif # CONFIG_MODULES
 # Directories & files removed with 'make clean'
 CLEAN_FILES += include/ksym vmlinux.symvers modules-only.symvers \
 	       modules.builtin modules.builtin.modinfo modules.nsdeps \
-	       compile_commands.json .thinlto-cache rust/test rust/doc \
+	       compile_commands.json rust/test rust/doc \
 	       .vmlinux.objs .vmlinux.export.c
 
 # Directories & files removed with 'make mrproper'
@@ -1884,7 +1883,7 @@ PHONY += compile_commands.json
 
 clean-dirs := $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)
 clean: rm-files := $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)/Module.symvers $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)/modules.nsdeps \
-	$(KBUILD_EXTMOD)/compile_commands.json $(KBUILD_EXTMOD)/.thinlto-cache
+	$(KBUILD_EXTMOD)/compile_commands.json
 
 PHONY += prepare
 # now expand this into a simple variable to reduce the cost of shell evaluations

base-commit: ae9f2a70d69e9c840ee1eda201f09662ca7e2038
-- 
2.45.2


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-13 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-13  7:12 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] kbuild: Remove support for Clang's ThinLTO caching" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2024-06-13 18:33 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2024-06-19 10:51   ` [PATCH 6.1.y] kbuild: Remove support for Clang's ThinLTO caching Greg KH
2024-06-19 14:23     ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-06-24 14:52       ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240613183322.1088226-1-nathan@kernel.org \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.