diff for duplicates of <20240614054534.GA9969@lst.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 6c954db..0949493 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -4,3 +4,7 @@ On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 09:10:37PM +0000, Gulam Mohamed wrote: > Please let us know your comments. I still think simply setting the rundown state is the better approach.. + + +-- +Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 2d4d1aa..e9a47b4 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,18 +2,18 @@ "ref\0202406112130.a572f72-oliver.sang@intel.com\0" "ref\0IA1PR10MB7240B2686664744DB0D8867F98C12@IA1PR10MB7240.namprd10.prod.outlook.com\0" "From\0hch@lst.de <hch@lst.de>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH V4 for-6.10/block] loop: Fix a race between loop detach and loop open\0" + "Subject\0Re: [LTP] [PATCH V4 for-6.10/block] loop: Fix a race between loop detach and loop open\0" "Date\0Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:45:34 +0200\0" "To\0Gulam Mohamed <gulam.mohamed@oracle.com>\0" - "Cc\0kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>" - oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev> + "Cc\0axboe@kernel.dk <axboe@kernel.dk>" lkp@intel.com <lkp@intel.com> - linux-block@vger.kernel.org <linux-block@vger.kernel.org> - ltp@lists.linux.it <ltp@lists.linux.it> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> + linux-block@vger.kernel.org <linux-block@vger.kernel.org> yukuai1@huaweicloud.com <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> + kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> + oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev> hch@lst.de <hch@lst.de> - " axboe@kernel.dk <axboe@kernel.dk>\0" + " ltp@lists.linux.it <ltp@lists.linux.it>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 09:10:37PM +0000, Gulam Mohamed wrote:\n" @@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ "> The tst_detach_device_by_fd() in LTP test case will open the loop device and repeatedly checks for error code ENXIO. As the new approach, as I mentioned above, will defer the detach to last close and the last close happens *only* when the LTP test function tst_detach_device_by_fd() returns, the test will obviously fail. So, Can you please modify the LTP test case to accommodate the new behaviour of kernel code for loop detach?\n" "> Please let us know your comments.\n" "\n" - I still think simply setting the rundown state is the better approach.. + "I still think simply setting the rundown state is the better approach..\n" + "\n" + "\n" + "-- \n" + Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp -24d845d4ad98d79bd3cbcc66352822ee224c08b49d4fe8bb6037985025be59e4 +b51116d4c565589113022140e8dcc6297da07477c612af67f4829f2e4a0a969f
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.