From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Chunxin Zang <spring.cxz@gmail.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, yu.c.chen@intel.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, jameshongleiwang@126.com,
yangchen11@lixiang.com, zangchunxin@lixiang.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/fair: Preempt if the current process is ineligible
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 14:51:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620125155.GY31592@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240613131437.9555-1-spring.cxz@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 09:14:37PM +0800, Chunxin Zang wrote:
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 03be0d1330a6..21ef610ddb14 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -745,6 +745,15 @@ int entity_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> return vruntime_eligible(cfs_rq, se->vruntime);
> }
>
> +static bool check_entity_need_preempt(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> +{
> + if (sched_feat(RUN_TO_PARITY) || cfs_rq->nr_running <= 1 ||
> + entity_eligible(cfs_rq, se))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static u64 __update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 vruntime)
> {
> u64 min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> @@ -974,11 +983,13 @@ static void clear_buddies(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se);
> /*
> * XXX: strictly: vd_i += N*r_i/w_i such that: vd_i > ve_i
> * this is probably good enough.
> + *
> + * return true if se need preempt
> */
> -static void update_deadline(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> +static bool update_deadline(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> {
> if ((s64)(se->vruntime - se->deadline) < 0)
> - return;
> + return false;
>
> /*
> * For EEVDF the virtual time slope is determined by w_i (iow.
> @@ -995,10 +1006,7 @@ static void update_deadline(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> /*
> * The task has consumed its request, reschedule.
> */
> - if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1) {
> - resched_curr(rq_of(cfs_rq));
> - clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
> - }
> + return true;
> }
>
> #include "pelt.h"
> @@ -1157,6 +1165,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> {
> struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr;
> s64 delta_exec;
> + bool need_preempt;
>
> if (unlikely(!curr))
> return;
> @@ -1166,12 +1175,17 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> return;
>
> curr->vruntime += calc_delta_fair(delta_exec, curr);
> - update_deadline(cfs_rq, curr);
> + need_preempt = update_deadline(cfs_rq, curr);
> update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
>
> if (entity_is_task(curr))
> update_curr_task(task_of(curr), delta_exec);
>
> + if (need_preempt || check_entity_need_preempt(cfs_rq, curr)) {
> + resched_curr(rq_of(cfs_rq));
> + clear_buddies(cfs_rq, curr);
> + }
> +
> account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
> }
Yeah sorry no. This will mess up the steady state schedule. At best we
can do something like the below which will make PREEMPT_SHORT a little
more effective I suppose.
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -985,10 +985,10 @@ static void clear_buddies(struct cfs_rq
* XXX: strictly: vd_i += N*r_i/w_i such that: vd_i > ve_i
* this is probably good enough.
*/
-static void update_deadline(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+static bool update_deadline(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
if ((s64)(se->vruntime - se->deadline) < 0)
- return;
+ return false;
/*
* For EEVDF the virtual time slope is determined by w_i (iow.
@@ -1005,10 +1005,7 @@ static void update_deadline(struct cfs_r
/*
* The task has consumed its request, reschedule.
*/
- if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1) {
- resched_curr(rq_of(cfs_rq));
- clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
- }
+ return true;
}
#include "pelt.h"
@@ -1168,6 +1165,8 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *c
{
struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr;
s64 delta_exec;
+ struct rq *rq;
+ bool resched;
if (unlikely(!curr))
return;
@@ -1177,13 +1176,23 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *c
return;
curr->vruntime += calc_delta_fair(delta_exec, curr);
- update_deadline(cfs_rq, curr);
+ resched = update_deadline(cfs_rq, curr);
update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
if (entity_is_task(curr))
update_curr_task(task_of(curr), delta_exec);
account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, delta_exec);
+
+ rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
+ if (rq->nr_running == 1)
+ return;
+
+ if (resched ||
+ (curr->vlag != curr->deadline && !entity_eligible(cfs_rq, curr))) {
+ resched_curr(rq);
+ clear_buddies(cfs_rq, curr);
+ }
}
static void update_curr_fair(struct rq *rq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-13 13:14 [PATCH v3] sched/fair: Preempt if the current process is ineligible Chunxin Zang
2024-06-20 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2024-06-21 13:53 ` Chunxin Zang
[not found] ` <36B22124-E952-4508-A4A3-5AE2C944FBDF@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <9e56b874-724e-4c2e-8e7d-db6317cb414c@gmail.com>
2024-07-15 13:05 ` John Stills
2024-07-16 9:52 ` Chunxin Zang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240620125155.GY31592@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jameshongleiwang@126.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=spring.cxz@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yangchen11@lixiang.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zangchunxin@lixiang.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.