All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xfs: move the dio write relocking out of xfs_ilock_for_iomap
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:40:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240620184034.GY103034@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240619115426.332708-2-hch@lst.de>

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:53:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> About half of xfs_ilock_for_iomap deals with a special case for direct
> I/O writes to COW files that need to take the ilock exclusively.  Move
> this code into the one callers that cares and simplify
> xfs_ilock_for_iomap.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

It took me a few minutes to sort this out, but yeah, directio writes are
the only place where we do this shared->cow->excl promotion dance.

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index 3783426739258c..b0085e5972393a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -717,53 +717,30 @@ imap_needs_cow(
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Extents not yet cached requires exclusive access, don't block for
> + * IOMAP_NOWAIT.
> + *
> + * This is basically an opencoded xfs_ilock_data_map_shared() call, but with
> + * support for IOMAP_NOWAIT.
> + */
>  static int
>  xfs_ilock_for_iomap(
>  	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
>  	unsigned		flags,
>  	unsigned		*lockmode)
>  {
> -	unsigned int		mode = *lockmode;
> -	bool			is_write = flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * COW writes may allocate delalloc space or convert unwritten COW
> -	 * extents, so we need to make sure to take the lock exclusively here.
> -	 */
> -	if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip) && is_write)
> -		mode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Extents not yet cached requires exclusive access, don't block.  This
> -	 * is an opencoded xfs_ilock_data_map_shared() call but with
> -	 * non-blocking behaviour.
> -	 */
> -	if (xfs_need_iread_extents(&ip->i_df)) {
> -		if (flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
> -			return -EAGAIN;
> -		mode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> -	}
> -
> -relock:
>  	if (flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT) {
> -		if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, mode))
> +		if (xfs_need_iread_extents(&ip->i_df))
> +			return -EAGAIN;
> +		if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, *lockmode))
>  			return -EAGAIN;
>  	} else {
> -		xfs_ilock(ip, mode);
> +		if (xfs_need_iread_extents(&ip->i_df))
> +			*lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> +		xfs_ilock(ip, *lockmode);
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * The reflink iflag could have changed since the earlier unlocked
> -	 * check, so if we got ILOCK_SHARED for a write and but we're now a
> -	 * reflink inode we have to switch to ILOCK_EXCL and relock.
> -	 */
> -	if (mode == XFS_ILOCK_SHARED && is_write && xfs_is_cow_inode(ip)) {
> -		xfs_iunlock(ip, mode);
> -		mode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> -		goto relock;
> -	}
> -
> -	*lockmode = mode;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -801,7 +778,7 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
>  	int			nimaps = 1, error = 0;
>  	bool			shared = false;
>  	u16			iomap_flags = 0;
> -	unsigned int		lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_SHARED;
> +	unsigned int		lockmode;
>  	u64			seq;
>  
>  	ASSERT(flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO));
> @@ -817,10 +794,30 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
>  	if (offset + length > i_size_read(inode))
>  		iomap_flags |= IOMAP_F_DIRTY;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * COW writes may allocate delalloc space or convert unwritten COW
> +	 * extents, so we need to make sure to take the lock exclusively here.
> +	 */
> +	if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip))
> +		lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> +	else
> +		lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_SHARED;
> +
> +relock:
>  	error = xfs_ilock_for_iomap(ip, flags, &lockmode);
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The reflink iflag could have changed since the earlier unlocked
> +	 * check, check if it again and relock if needed.
> +	 */
> +	if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip) && lockmode == XFS_ILOCK_SHARED) {
> +		xfs_iunlock(ip, lockmode);
> +		lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> +		goto relock;
> +	}
> +
>  	error = xfs_bmapi_read(ip, offset_fsb, end_fsb - offset_fsb, &imap,
>  			       &nimaps, 0);
>  	if (error)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-20 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-19 11:53 clean up I/O path inode locking helpers and the page fault handler Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: move the dio write relocking out of xfs_ilock_for_iomap Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:40   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: cleanup xfs_ilock_iocb_for_write Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:41   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: simplify xfs_dax_fault Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21  5:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-21 17:43       ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: refactor __xfs_filemap_fault Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21  5:08     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: always take XFS_MMAPLOCK shared in xfs_dax_fault Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-19 11:53 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: fold xfs_ilock_for_write_fault into xfs_write_fault Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-20 18:57   ` Darrick J. Wong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-23  5:44 clean up I/O path inode locking helpers and the page fault handler v2 Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-23  5:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: move the dio write relocking out of xfs_ilock_for_iomap Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240620184034.GY103034@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.