From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B779BC2BA1A for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E1910F093; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: gabe.freedesktop.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pXzTM92/"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA40C10F093 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2141E623A3; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:41:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C227C2BBFC; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:41:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1718959287; bh=j3L45u3qT07bx2aznJCokKwbZEumckaEMAFPmA37S4U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pXzTM92/7qoZtDkL5kgw3/3MpbNZAO+S33/HBjta1Rd6Z0HuGnqidU5y/sGgXTWUJ WUPbuPSgPBgf+ZY+/OS42DhgBM2u0KQqEyjSrOP0T6vo80IsdUNd1ZH/+HQhj5BvhV Xkud3pjd7Dg6WqeuB43cFWXoRV/36mVDbSrdTz6bfurs74Ned3dC6eIod7/AxCW8YJ +QFs1/7RJPCzhH2pw3vrp+pLrfGXrqJ0LrZyIoT9YKDr0oI8n4dpzGCBUzqNdkTSqi LUWfWe4UvspQxzOO4Y+ytCUt6DJu+Aa6tjtN9vPe8fVtpMnaFvc+np7ptL58CzMiR0 LKv0W6h7u2QDw== Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:41:24 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Dave Stevenson Cc: Maarten Lankhorst , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: drm : vc4: Add Raspberry Pi as maintainers Message-ID: <20240621-towering-fat-bug-2eea23@houat> References: <20240620111401.3629380-1-dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com> <20240620-optimistic-kittiwake-of-vitality-f1ae20@houat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rvxagco4diwbzta6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" --rvxagco4diwbzta6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 03:06:11PM GMT, Dave Stevenson wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 14:52, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:14:00PM GMT, Dave Stevenson wrote: > > > Add myself and our kernel maintenance list as maintainers for > > > VC4 alongside Maxime. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson > > > --- > > > MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > index d1566c647a50..b6dd628d5bc6 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -7520,6 +7520,8 @@ F: include/uapi/drm/v3d_drm.h > > > > > > DRM DRIVERS FOR VC4 > > > M: Maxime Ripard > > > +M: Dave Stevenson > > > +M: Raspberry Pi Kernel Maintenance > > > > I don't think we can put a list as maintainer, maintainers (and > > reviewers) should be explicit. We can definitely put the list as Cc with > > L: though :) >=20 > It's been accepted for Unicam > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/MAINTAINERS#L4178-L4183 I think it's somewhat different in the case of v4l2, you're the one taking the patches and sending a PR iirc. In drm-misc, there's a significant chance someone else will apply it. > bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com is listed as reviewer for a fair > number of entries. It's also a matter of signalling to the rest of the kernel community how important a review is: if I get a review of someone on a patch that isn't listed in MAINTAINERS, then it's valid but not enough for me to merge it. If it's from a reviewer, then it carries more weight, and if it's from a maintainer, then it's pretty much the final word. That only works if we explicitly put names in MAINTAINERS. But I also don't care how many maintainers or reviewers you want to put in MAINTAINERS, so it's not gatekeeping. It's mostly just around documenting what the situation will be :) Maxime --rvxagco4diwbzta6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCZnU8swAKCRDj7w1vZxhR xfT4AP9994nrGkFrzuXbXQYFPGXmd6KjO9234AQrdkKgA9QNXgD+NozVeFPDzjO/ b+tATgx7XF/Xc23UVlOG61T2uGA7iwI= =5Dul -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rvxagco4diwbzta6--