From: cel@kernel.org
To: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for pNFS SCSI layout PR key registration
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:22:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240621162227.215412-6-cel@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
The double registration/unregistration I observed was actually the
registration and unregistration of two separate block devices: one
for /media/test and one for /media/scratch. So, that was a false
alarm.
The complete fstests run shows:
Failures: generic/126 generic/355 generic/450 generic/740
unknown: run fstests generic/108 at 2024-06-21 10:13:58
systemd[1]: Started fstests-generic-108.scope - /usr/bin/bash -c test -w /proc/self/oom_score_adj && echo 250 > /proc/self/oom_score_adj; exec ./tests/generic/108.
kernel: sd 6:0:0:1: reservation conflict
kernel: sd 6:0:0:1: [sdb] tag#30 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s
kernel: sd 6:0:0:1: [sdb] tag#30 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00
kernel: reservation conflict error, dev sdb, sector 0 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 32 prio class 2
systemd[1]: fstests-generic-108.scope: Deactivated successfully.
These errors appear in the system journal only when the whole
fstests series is run. I can see the "block_rq_complete [-52]" in
the trace log. But the test output shows:
generic/108 [not run] require cel-nfsd:/export/nfs-pnfs-fs-s to be valid block disk
generic/450 is also failing:
generic/450 - output mismatch (see /data/fstests-install/xfstests/results/cel-nfs-pnfs/6.10.0-rc4-gd24c98202dbe/nfs_pnfs/generic/450.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/450.out 2024-06-20 16:50:06.548035014 -0400
+++ /data/fstests-install/xfstests/results/cel-nfs-pnfs/6.10.0-rc4-gd24c98202dbe/nfs_pnfs/generic/450.out.bad 2024-06-21 10:44:02.600634341 -0400
@@ -8,4 +8,6 @@
direct read the second block contains EOF
direct read a sector at (after) EOF
direct read the last sector past EOF
+expect [2093056,4096,0], got [2093056,4096,4096]
direct read at far away from EOF
+expect [104857600,4096,0], got [104857600,4096,4096]
...
However this might be a bug that existed before this series.
The other three explicit test failures are usual for NFSv4.1.
---
Changes since RFC:
- series re-ordered to place fixes first
- address review comments as best I can
Chuck Lever (4):
nfs/blocklayout: Fix premature PR key unregistration
nfs/blocklayout: Use bulk page allocation APIs
nfs/blocklayout: Report only when /no/ device is found
nfs/blocklayout: SCSI layout trace points for reservation key
reg/unreg
fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c | 13 ++++-
fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.h | 8 ++-
fs/nfs/blocklayout/dev.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++---------
fs/nfs/nfs4trace.c | 7 +++
fs/nfs/nfs4trace.h | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c | 15 +++---
6 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
--
2.45.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-21 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-21 16:22 cel [this message]
2024-06-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] nfs/blocklayout: Fix premature PR key unregistration cel
2024-06-22 5:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-22 17:26 ` Chuck Lever
2024-06-23 7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:08 ` Chuck Lever
2024-06-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] nfs/blocklayout: Use bulk page allocation APIs cel
2024-06-22 5:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-22 16:29 ` Chuck Lever
2024-06-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] nfs/blocklayout: Report only when /no/ device is found cel
2024-06-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] nfs/blocklayout: SCSI layout trace points for reservation key reg/unreg cel
2024-06-21 17:21 ` Anna Schumaker
2024-06-21 17:46 ` Chuck Lever III
2024-06-22 5:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-21 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for pNFS SCSI layout PR key registration Benjamin Coddington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240621162227.215412-6-cel@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.