All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cel@kernel.org
To: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for pNFS SCSI layout PR key registration
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:22:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240621162227.215412-6-cel@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

The double registration/unregistration I observed was actually the
registration and unregistration of two separate block devices: one
for /media/test and one for /media/scratch. So, that was a false
alarm.

The complete fstests run shows:

Failures: generic/126 generic/355 generic/450 generic/740

unknown: run fstests generic/108 at 2024-06-21 10:13:58
systemd[1]: Started fstests-generic-108.scope - /usr/bin/bash -c test -w /proc/self/oom_score_adj && echo 250 > /proc/self/oom_score_adj; exec ./tests/generic/108.
kernel: sd 6:0:0:1: reservation conflict
kernel: sd 6:0:0:1: [sdb] tag#30 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s
kernel: sd 6:0:0:1: [sdb] tag#30 CDB: Read(10) 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00
kernel: reservation conflict error, dev sdb, sector 0 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 32 prio class 2
systemd[1]: fstests-generic-108.scope: Deactivated successfully.

These errors appear in the system journal only when the whole
fstests series is run. I can see the "block_rq_complete [-52]" in
the trace log. But the test output shows:

generic/108       [not run] require cel-nfsd:/export/nfs-pnfs-fs-s to be valid block disk

generic/450 is also failing:

generic/450       - output mismatch (see /data/fstests-install/xfstests/results/cel-nfs-pnfs/6.10.0-rc4-gd24c98202dbe/nfs_pnfs/generic/450.out.bad)
    --- tests/generic/450.out	2024-06-20 16:50:06.548035014 -0400
    +++ /data/fstests-install/xfstests/results/cel-nfs-pnfs/6.10.0-rc4-gd24c98202dbe/nfs_pnfs/generic/450.out.bad	2024-06-21 10:44:02.600634341 -0400
    @@ -8,4 +8,6 @@
     direct read the second block contains EOF
     direct read a sector at (after) EOF
     direct read the last sector past EOF
    +expect [2093056,4096,0], got [2093056,4096,4096]
     direct read at far away from EOF
    +expect [104857600,4096,0], got [104857600,4096,4096]
    ...

However this might be a bug that existed before this series.

The other three explicit test failures are usual for NFSv4.1.

---
Changes since RFC:
- series re-ordered to place fixes first
- address review comments as best I can

Chuck Lever (4):
  nfs/blocklayout: Fix premature PR key unregistration
  nfs/blocklayout: Use bulk page allocation APIs
  nfs/blocklayout: Report only when /no/ device is found
  nfs/blocklayout: SCSI layout trace points for reservation key
    reg/unreg

 fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c | 13 ++++-
 fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.h |  8 ++-
 fs/nfs/blocklayout/dev.c         | 72 +++++++++++++++++---------
 fs/nfs/nfs4trace.c               |  7 +++
 fs/nfs/nfs4trace.h               | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/nfs/pnfs_dev.c                | 15 +++---
 6 files changed, 166 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

-- 
2.45.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-06-21 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-21 16:22 cel [this message]
2024-06-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] nfs/blocklayout: Fix premature PR key unregistration cel
2024-06-22  5:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-22 17:26     ` Chuck Lever
2024-06-23  7:36       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 15:08         ` Chuck Lever
2024-06-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] nfs/blocklayout: Use bulk page allocation APIs cel
2024-06-22  5:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-22 16:29     ` Chuck Lever
2024-06-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] nfs/blocklayout: Report only when /no/ device is found cel
2024-06-21 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] nfs/blocklayout: SCSI layout trace points for reservation key reg/unreg cel
2024-06-21 17:21   ` Anna Schumaker
2024-06-21 17:46     ` Chuck Lever III
2024-06-22  5:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-21 18:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for pNFS SCSI layout PR key registration Benjamin Coddington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240621162227.215412-6-cel@kernel.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.