From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 454A51DFEA; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719242437; cv=none; b=g+65n3b9JqXhlldieqHuhXDpfi+12aGrwSi49Dd35nG0Z7EmLrMJZUbl6YZcFsOHmyoGRyTO3zvG4h3I/jiYID1sJxWm+NOSs0fnR28YxC6YROPFvOPVDe7lFRDBpd9YH/5i09HuoB1XikQTCaKB9JrsZ0jqWoTghGExPhAd/+o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719242437; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/E9O2ottwm4ttwGeO0wU48nA9Dao832H9uEl8uWGVRs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oO2uPLbjYj26viXxV2QCI0+ogiZjtrsVggrltLcnDkrT//UClxADbovlPTXOoDn/NmO/Cn7MbTbxCCGdrLonLgdkaRCG0wj/KnR+l0gjaNWVjTM2IG40T8U690wZLAayq2SPMAULWx7OjQJ6+crzOyMURezvRZvwTlQt70sBFio= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id AAC0B68D05; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:20:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:20:28 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Niklas Cassel Cc: Christoph Hellwig , kernel test robot , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, Jens Axboe , Damien Le Moal , Hannes Reinecke , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, nbd@other.debian.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com Subject: Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] bd4a633b6f: fsmark.files_per_sec -64.5% regression Message-ID: <20240624152028.GA11961@lst.de> References: <202406241546.6bbd44a7-oliver.sang@intel.com> <20240624083537.GA19941@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:45:57PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote: > Seems to be ATA SSD: > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240624/202406241546.6bbd44a7-oliver.sang@intel.com/job.yaml > > ssd_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSC2BG012T4_BTHC428201ZX1P2OGN-part1" > > Most likely btrfs does something different depending on the nonrot flag > being set or not. (And like you are suggesting, most likely the value of > the nonrot flag is somehow different after commit bd4a633b6f) Yes, btrfs does. That's why I'm curious about the before and after, as I can't see any way how they would be set differently. Right now I can only claim with vitual AHCI devices, which claim to be rotational, though. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9441AC3064D for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:20:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=L+oiyk275kS+tS1erkcPb7c8v/XYce2Q2DbXceQjmDM=; b=kt+O1PlriQrk7B d1ReuepWix6KpOj8rs9hw7L7mHwEotE1TrVfXIf/nEUu4NsEvSnlsz+SePVA+Whp3J8BAPawPT/Wl tj9cT2WOgUIwtO+T3EtJML7k5QoGb/KGVE0M9sKPVIXL3WWfeBwL/VB9YmhWFFf8+pR6Q+k/0EEP1 u99Aa4n83Fr+YvMKx+go7xaTr5pLL5cdyudTnE8tbmqYMo1UwyKdlVi/rHeiOfnfi8Y0EF8xSWEFe WaQW52yGFa9UpXRwIW739ymO7by4cm+RU0jTYPsccIaK570jOzXVnyjVC7orHXJvRLwz4M/eyhWlZ zsJ0XYrchq+c4KV7y6Zw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sLlUj-0000000HHvQ-14Ln; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:20:37 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sLlUf-0000000HHuV-2E58; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:20:35 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id AAC0B68D05; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:20:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:20:28 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Niklas Cassel Cc: Christoph Hellwig , kernel test robot , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, Jens Axboe , Damien Le Moal , Hannes Reinecke , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, nbd@other.debian.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com Subject: Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] bd4a633b6f: fsmark.files_per_sec -64.5% regression Message-ID: <20240624152028.GA11961@lst.de> References: <202406241546.6bbd44a7-oliver.sang@intel.com> <20240624083537.GA19941@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240624_082033_752930_770476C7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.01 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:45:57PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote: > Seems to be ATA SSD: > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240624/202406241546.6bbd44a7-oliver.sang@intel.com/job.yaml > > ssd_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSC2BG012T4_BTHC428201ZX1P2OGN-part1" > > Most likely btrfs does something different depending on the nonrot flag > being set or not. (And like you are suggesting, most likely the value of > the nonrot flag is somehow different after commit bd4a633b6f) Yes, btrfs does. That's why I'm curious about the before and after, as I can't see any way how they would be set differently. Right now I can only claim with vitual AHCI devices, which claim to be rotational, though. ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 941EEC2BD09 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4W7BVz15ydz3gDW for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:20:59 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lst.de (client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W7BVV67Vwz3dKH for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:20:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id AAC0B68D05; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:20:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:20:28 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Niklas Cassel Subject: Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] bd4a633b6f: fsmark.files_per_sec -64.5% regression Message-ID: <20240624152028.GA11961@lst.de> References: <202406241546.6bbd44a7-oliver.sang@intel.com> <20240624083537.GA19941@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, feng.tang@intel.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, fengwei.yin@intel.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, nbd@other.debian.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Damien Le Moal , Hannes Reinecke , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:45:57PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote: > Seems to be ATA SSD: > https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240624/202406241546.6bbd44a7-oliver.sang@intel.com/job.yaml > > ssd_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSC2BG012T4_BTHC428201ZX1P2OGN-part1" > > Most likely btrfs does something different depending on the nonrot flag > being set or not. (And like you are suggesting, most likely the value of > the nonrot flag is somehow different after commit bd4a633b6f) Yes, btrfs does. That's why I'm curious about the before and after, as I can't see any way how they would be set differently. Right now I can only claim with vitual AHCI devices, which claim to be rotational, though.