From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B14EDC2BBCA for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:05:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=BivAvNhVtbmfJ49iI0EWdiBNlfZYeTH7nl5+DWK1/3A=; b=LGszX99iM9ObCGLdXHDySmsURQ 6RGELdd9Qs9s+wgT6T85tgKwFSelDJEEVonvwB/5N6HvxRGTB3N1DIFipvACnvWt9U9pbDGAr3GpC Z2iwLIMfwuRaP1ltHns0FU9olmbg9T27+91LNWrHbG23G96AJ+IX8oEQ65bcC9KqqBcVbuPbr79VV p8NJL7bBl4bX83NAIu1pWHkCSC0oUo118IFeFXTqUoEufvuqtijnS4akPBaoZ3ikB/lFyoyoGrpMS 0XD+1NFUX7VvK0/NHKSQ4SI6mI0wt+Wb2Tzcf2YbCRlzMqk0Ie6XIQFDx8u7t0KIck+MCvMG9gHbS FIsRECtw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sM7jg-00000003Mlf-0x9F; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:05:32 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sM7h5-00000003Kpm-0JUj for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:02:57 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5FF614AD; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6396C32782; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:02:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1719327770; bh=gQp1PmCHyGQ77qf5D9jrz9q7coboBiVr0Zb41/eD03w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IEJ42l8gT3X8doXsnqHqTK8SMiUZG9cxuttYRdr72Jg+ZELp5cJ52er5K3gzhNkj8 8PojVEtgqXtNAaymeCQVTYJMpl1/L4viulb3dfpLubcTAGqBiHLF++E3y9cMUO5mpA TSapdKD+XvhNE2fNPvIkTHEuUEAg1UXUvN+Lqurxo/YIXrZpo2WSgOIInAVHXIyjYR hcM9lCgRLgPSnyyF6sGmHmv2nd+6rWBztxRu7umRKPFik+wzPC4L7Q3kwqGaF10EKe aEJAAf14l6TlWwuPd+X7Xpb3GzIQmuQsn6ExkmdL5O//RogMJGQ0QeBlIoDLbgWp4V 6vdeshDRSSMBQ== Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:02:48 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Kalle Valo Cc: Jeff Johnson , Koen Vandeputte , , linux-wireless , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , , Johannes Berg , Kees Cook Subject: Re: ieee80211.h virtual_map splat Message-ID: <20240625080248.32c3e03d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <87o77pik7w.fsf@kernel.org> References: <87o77pik7w.fsf@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240625_080251_607799_25F2DABD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.70 ) X-BeenThere: ath10k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+ath10k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:56:35 +0300 Kalle Valo wrote: > > Adding netdev to the initial message in the thread. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAPh3n83zb1PwFBFijJKChBqY95zzpYh=2iPf8tmh=YTS6e3xPw@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > There was some discussion in the thread, with the observation that the splat > > is fixed by: > > 2ae5c9248e06 ("wifi: mac80211: Use flexible array in struct ieee80211_tim_ie") > > > > Followed by discussion if this should be backported. > > > > Kees said that "netdev [...] maintainers have asked that contributors not > > include "Cc: stable" tags, as they want to evaluate for themselves whether > > patches should go to stable or not" > > BTW this rule doesn't apply to wireless subsystem. For wireless patches > it's ok to "Cc: stable" in patches or anyone can send a request to > stable maintainers to pick a patch. It's an old rule. Quoting documentation: Stable tree ~~~~~~~~~~~ While it used to be the case that netdev submissions were not supposed to carry explicit ``CC: stable@vger.kernel.org`` tags that is no longer the case today. Please follow the standard stable rules in :ref:`Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst `, and make sure you include appropriate Fixes tags! See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#stable-tree