From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] task_work: Provide means to check if a work is queued
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:15:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240625141539.GA14254@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240625135244.20227-2-frederic@kernel.org>
On 06/25, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/task_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/task_work.c
> @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ void task_work_run(void)
>
> do {
> next = work->next;
> + work->next = TASK_WORK_DEQUEUED;
OK, but then the additional change below makes sense too?
Oleg.
---
--- x/kernel/task_work.c
+++ x/kernel/task_work.c
@@ -106,8 +106,10 @@ task_work_cancel_match(struct task_struc
if (!match(work, data)) {
pprev = &work->next;
work = READ_ONCE(*pprev);
- } else if (try_cmpxchg(pprev, &work, work->next))
+ } else if (try_cmpxchg(pprev, &work, work->next)) {
+ work->next = TASK_WORK_DEQUEUED;
break;
+ }
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-25 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 13:52 [RFC PATCH 0/6] mm: LRU drain flush on nohz_full Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-25 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] task_work: Provide means to check if a work is queued Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-25 14:15 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-06-25 15:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-07-03 12:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-03 12:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-16 13:00 ` Valentin Schneider
2024-06-25 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] sched/fair: Use task_work_queued() on numa_work Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-16 13:00 ` Valentin Schneider
2024-06-25 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] sched: Use task_work_queued() on cid_work Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-16 13:00 ` Valentin Schneider
2024-06-25 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] tick/nohz: Move nohz_full related fields out of hot task struct's places Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-25 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] sched/isolation: Introduce isolated task work Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-26 13:27 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-07-03 12:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-25 13:52 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] mm: Drain LRUs upon resume to userspace on nohz_full CPUs Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-25 14:20 ` Michal Hocko
2024-06-26 13:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-06-27 6:54 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-03 12:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-07-04 13:11 ` Michal Hocko
2024-07-17 13:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240625141539.GA14254@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.