From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] btrfs: don't hold dev_replace rwsem over whole of btrfs_map_block
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:13:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240701141320.GI504479@perftesting> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240701-b4-rst-updates-v3-4-e0437e1e04a6@kernel.org>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 12:25:18PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
>
> Don't hold the dev_replace rwsem for the entirety of btrfs_map_block().
>
> It is only needed to protect
> a) calls to find_live_mirror() and
> b) calling into handle_ops_on_dev_replace().
>
> But there is no need to hold the rwsem for any kind of set_io_stripe()
> calls.
>
> So relax taking the dev_replace rwsem to only protect both cases and check
> if the device replace status has changed in the meantime, for which we have
> to re-do the find_live_mirror() calls.
>
> This fixes a deadlock on raid-stripe-tree where device replace performs a
> scrub operation, which in turn calls into btrfs_map_block() to find the
> physical location of the block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-01 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-01 10:25 [PATCH v3 0/5] btrfs: rst: updates for RAID stripe tree Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] btrfs: replace stripe extents Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 13:57 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 15:08 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 20:34 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 20:37 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-02 5:41 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] btrfs: split RAID stripes on deletion Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:07 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-03 15:47 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] btrfs: stripe-tree: add selftests Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:08 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 15:09 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] btrfs: don't hold dev_replace rwsem over whole of btrfs_map_block Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:13 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2024-07-01 10:25 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] btrfs: rst: don't print tree dump in case lookup fails Johannes Thumshirn
2024-07-01 14:12 ` Josef Bacik
2024-07-01 15:03 ` Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240701141320.GI504479@perftesting \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.