All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeroendb@google.com,
	pkaligineedi@google.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, willemb@google.com,
	hramamurthy@google.com, Shailend Chand <shailend@google.com>,
	Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] gve: Add retry logic for recoverable adminq errors
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 14:25:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240701142502.1a831c74@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANzqiF7TQW2yUM14XS68CxM35yJpq8DCRJRonMcyfTpfatBtMQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 29 Jun 2024 10:56:27 -0700 Rushil Gupta wrote:
> > Since Jeroen is a maintainer of this driver, and you are not listed
> > in the MAINTAINERS file I don't understand why you're the one sending
> > this. We can't teach everyone at google the upstream process one by
> > one so I'd like to request that only the listed maintainers post pure
> > GVE patches (or the folks who are heavily involved upstream).  
> 
> I could not find one single documentation that says only listed
> maintainers can post pure patches.
> Authors of some of the recently accepted patches were in fact not in
> the MAINTAINERS file.

It's not documented because we have to resort to it very rarely.
The escalation path is - remind of the process -> request that
someone knowledgeable reviews the code prior to posting -> limit
submitters.

> I am sending this patch as I was involved in getting this code to the
> upstream-ready state and testing it internally.
> However, if other GVE maintainers wish to follow this rule; I am ok
> with your suggestion.

      reply	other threads:[~2024-07-01 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-28 20:41 [PATCH net-next] gve: Add retry logic for recoverable adminq errors Rushil Gupta
2024-06-29  1:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-29 17:56   ` Rushil Gupta
2024-07-01 21:25     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240701142502.1a831c74@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hramamurthy@google.com \
    --cc=jeroendb@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pkaligineedi@google.com \
    --cc=rushilg@google.com \
    --cc=shailend@google.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=ziweixiao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.