From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, willy@infradead.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: remove prefetchw() on freeing page to buddy system
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:22:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240701232224.43d5243ec9f15aa3e29a7ec5@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240702020931.7061-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 02:09:31 +0000 Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> wrote:
> The prefetchw() is introduced from an ancient patch[1].
>
> The change log says:
>
> The basic idea is to free higher order pages instead of going
> through every single one. Also, some unnecessary atomic operations
> are done away with and replaced with non-atomic equivalents, and
> prefetching is done where it helps the most. For a more in-depth
> discusion of this patch, please see the linux-ia64 archives (topic
> is "free bootmem feedback patch").
>
> So there are several changes improve the bootmem freeing, in which the
> most basic idea is freeing higher order pages. And as Matthew says,
> "Itanium CPUs of this era had no prefetchers."
>
> I did 10 round bootup tests before and after this change, the data
> doesn't prove prefetchw() help speeding up bootmem freeing. The sum of
> the 10 round bootmem freeing time after prefetchw() removal even 5.2%
> faster than before.
I don't think I've ever seen prefetch make a damn bit of difference.
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ia64/40F46962.4090604@sgi.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> CC: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> The patch is based on mm-stable with David's change.
Oh help. David makes many changes. Please identify patches with much
care. Fully quoting the email title works, as does a link.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-02 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-02 2:09 [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: remove prefetchw() on freeing page to buddy system Wei Yang
2024-07-02 6:22 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-07-03 0:01 ` Wei Yang
2024-07-03 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-03 0:55 ` Wei Yang
2024-07-02 6:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-03 0:12 ` Wei Yang
2024-07-03 8:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-04 3:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-04 3:37 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-04 3:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-04 3:43 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240701232224.43d5243ec9f15aa3e29a7ec5@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.