From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev, puranjay@kernel.org,
jose.marchesi@oracle.com, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC bpf-next v2 9/9] selftests/bpf: test no_caller_saved_registers spill/fill removal
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:24:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240704102402.1644916-10-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240704102402.1644916-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Tests for no_caller_saved_registers processing logic
(see verifier.c:match_and_mark_nocsr_pattern()):
- a canary positive test case;
- a canary test case for arm64 and riscv64;
- various tests with broken patterns;
- tests with read/write fixed/varying stack access that violate nocsr
stack access contract;
- tests with multiple subprograms.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_nocsr.c | 521 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 523 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_nocsr.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 6816ff064516..8ca306c28e62 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
#include "verifier_movsx.skel.h"
#include "verifier_netfilter_ctx.skel.h"
#include "verifier_netfilter_retcode.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_nocsr.skel.h"
#include "verifier_precision.skel.h"
#include "verifier_prevent_map_lookup.skel.h"
#include "verifier_raw_stack.skel.h"
@@ -171,6 +172,7 @@ void test_verifier_meta_access(void) { RUN(verifier_meta_access); }
void test_verifier_movsx(void) { RUN(verifier_movsx); }
void test_verifier_netfilter_ctx(void) { RUN(verifier_netfilter_ctx); }
void test_verifier_netfilter_retcode(void) { RUN(verifier_netfilter_retcode); }
+void test_verifier_nocsr(void) { RUN(verifier_nocsr); }
void test_verifier_precision(void) { RUN(verifier_precision); }
void test_verifier_prevent_map_lookup(void) { RUN(verifier_prevent_map_lookup); }
void test_verifier_raw_stack(void) { RUN(verifier_raw_stack); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_nocsr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_nocsr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4e767d768f1c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_nocsr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,521 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("4: r5 = 5")
+__xlated("5: w0 = ")
+__xlated("6: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("7: r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)")
+__xlated("8: exit")
+__success
+__naked void simple(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "r2 = 2;"
+ "r3 = 3;"
+ "r4 = 4;"
+ "r5 = 5;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 24) = r2;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 32) = r3;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 40) = r4;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 48) = r5;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r5 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 48);"
+ "r4 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 40);"
+ "r3 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 32);"
+ "r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 24);"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* The logic for detecting and verifying nocsr pattern is the same for
+ * any arch, however x86 differs from arm64 or riscv64 in a way
+ * bpf_get_smp_processor_id is rewritten:
+ * - on x86 it is done by verifier
+ * - on arm64 and riscv64 it is done by jit
+ *
+ * Which leads to different xlated patterns for different archs:
+ * - on x86 the call is expanded as 3 instructions
+ * - on arm64 and riscv64 the call remains as is
+ * (but spills/fills are still removed)
+ *
+ * It is really desirable to check instruction indexes in the xlated
+ * patterns, so add this canary test to check that function rewrite by
+ * jit is correctly processed by nocsr logic, keep the rest of the
+ * tests as x86.
+ */
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_arm64
+__arch_riscv64
+__xlated("0: r1 = 1")
+__xlated("1: call bpf_get_smp_processor_id")
+__xlated("2: exit")
+__success
+__naked void canary_arm64_riscv64(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("1: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("3: exit")
+__success
+__naked void canary_zero_spills(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1")
+__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("5: r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)")
+__success
+__naked void wrong_reg_in_pattern1(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r6")
+__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("5: r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)")
+__success
+__naked void wrong_reg_in_pattern2(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r6 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r6;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r6 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r0")
+__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("5: r0 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)")
+__success
+__naked void wrong_reg_in_pattern3(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r0 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r0;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r0 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("2: *(u64 *)(r2 -16) = r1")
+__xlated("4: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("6: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)")
+__success
+__naked void wrong_base_in_pattern(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "r2 = r10;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r2 - 16) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1")
+__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("5: r2 = 1")
+__success
+__naked void wrong_insn_in_pattern(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r2 = 1;"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("2: *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1")
+__xlated("4: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("6: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)")
+__success
+__naked void wrong_off_in_pattern1(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("1: *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = r1")
+__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("5: r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 -4)")
+__success
+__naked void wrong_off_in_pattern2(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r10 - 4) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 - 4);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("1: *(u32 *)(r10 -16) = r1")
+__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("5: r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 -16)")
+__success
+__naked void wrong_size_in_pattern(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("2: *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+__xlated("4: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("6: r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 -8)")
+__success
+__naked void partial_pattern(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "r2 = 2;"
+ "*(u32 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r2;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "r1 = *(u32 *)(r10 - 8);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("0: r1 = 1")
+__xlated("1: r2 = 2")
+/* not patched, spills for -8, -16 not removed */
+__xlated("2: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+__xlated("3: *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r2")
+__xlated("5: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("7: r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)")
+__xlated("8: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)")
+/* patched, spills for -16, -24 removed */
+__xlated("10: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("12: exit")
+__success
+__naked void min_stack_offset(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "r2 = 2;"
+ /* this call won't be patched */
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r2;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);"
+ /* this call would be patched */
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 24) = r2;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 24);"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("5: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)")
+__success
+__naked void bad_fixed_read(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += -8;"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 - 0);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("5: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)")
+__success
+__naked void bad_fixed_write(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += -8;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r1 - 0) = r1;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("6: *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1")
+__xlated("8: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("10: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)")
+__success
+__naked void bad_varying_read(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0);" /* random scalar value */
+ "r6 &= 0x7;" /* r6 range [0..7] */
+ "r6 += 0x2;" /* r6 range [2..9] */
+ "r7 = 0;"
+ "r7 -= r6;" /* r7 range [-9..-2] */
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += r7;"
+ "r1 = *(u8 *)(r1 - 0);" /* touches slot [-16..-9] where spills are stored */
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("6: *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1")
+__xlated("8: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("10: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16)")
+__success
+__naked void bad_varying_write(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r6 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0);" /* random scalar value */
+ "r6 &= 0x7;" /* r6 range [0..7] */
+ "r6 += 0x2;" /* r6 range [2..9] */
+ "r7 = 0;"
+ "r7 -= r6;" /* r7 range [-9..-2] */
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += r7;"
+ "*(u8 *)(r1 - 0) = r7;" /* touches slot [-16..-9] where spills are stored */
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("5: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)")
+__success
+__naked void bad_write_in_subprog(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += -8;"
+ "call bad_write_in_subprog_aux;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+__used
+__naked static void bad_write_in_subprog_aux(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r0 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r1 - 0) = r0;" /* invalidates nocsr contract for caller: */
+ "exit;" /* caller stack at -8 used outside of the pattern */
+ ::: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+/* main, not patched */
+__xlated("1: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1")
+__xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("5: r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)")
+__xlated("9: call pc+1")
+__xlated("10: exit")
+/* subprogram, patched */
+__xlated("11: r1 = 1")
+__xlated("13: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("15: exit")
+__success
+__naked void invalidate_one_subprog(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);"
+ "r1 = r10;"
+ "r1 += -8;"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 - 0);"
+ "call invalidate_one_subprog_aux;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+__used
+__naked static void invalidate_one_subprog_aux(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__arch_x86_64
+/* main */
+__xlated("0: r1 = 1")
+__xlated("2: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("4: call pc+1")
+__xlated("5: exit")
+/* subprogram */
+__xlated("6: r1 = 1")
+__xlated("8: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)")
+__xlated("10: *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r1")
+__xlated("11: exit")
+__success
+__naked void subprogs_use_independent_offsets(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);"
+ "call subprogs_use_independent_offsets_aux;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+__used
+__naked static void subprogs_use_independent_offsets_aux(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (
+ "r1 = 1;"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 24) = r1;"
+ "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];"
+ "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 24);"
+ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;"
+ "exit;"
+ :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-04 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-04 10:23 [RFC bpf-next v2 0/9] no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] bpf: add a get_helper_proto() utility function Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-09 23:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 0:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 2/9] bpf: no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-09 23:42 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 3:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 6:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 7:57 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 15:36 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 16:15 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 17:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 18:40 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 18:49 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 19:03 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 19:16 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 19:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-10 19:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 19:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-10 9:46 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 15:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-10 1:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-10 3:06 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 3/9] bpf, x86, riscv, arm: no_caller_saved_registers for bpf_get_smp_processor_id() Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 4/9] selftests/bpf: extract utility function for BPF disassembly Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-09 23:46 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 5/9] selftests/bpf: no need to track next_match_pos in struct test_loader Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 6/9] selftests/bpf: extract test_loader->expect_msgs as a data structure Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:23 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 7/9] selftests/bpf: allow checking xlated programs in verifier_* tests Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-04 10:24 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 8/9] selftests/bpf: __arch_* macro to limit test cases to specific archs Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-09 23:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-04 10:24 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-07-08 11:44 ` [RFC bpf-next v2 0/9] no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls Puranjay Mohan
2024-07-08 17:29 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-07-10 1:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-10 3:35 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240704102402.1644916-10-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.