From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Somalapuram Amaranath" <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 7/8] drm/ttm: Use the LRU walker for eviction
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:32:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240705153206.68526-8-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240705153206.68526-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Use the LRU walker for eviction. This helps
removing a lot of code with weird locking
semantics.
The functionality is slightly changed so that
when trylocked buffer objects are exhausted, we
continue to interleave walks with ticket-locks while
there is still progress made. The list walks are
not restarted in-between evictions.
Also provide a separate ttm_bo_evict_first()
function for its single user. The context of that
user allows sleeping dma_resv locks.
v6:
- Various cleanups suggested by Matthew Brost.
- Fix error return code of ttm_bo_evict_first(). (Matthew Brost)
- Fix an error check that was inverted. (Matthew Brost)
v7:
- Use s64 rather than long (Christian König)
- Early ttm_resource_cursor_fini() in ttm_bo_evict_first().
- Simplify check for bo_moved in ttm_bo_evict_first().
(Christian König)
- Don't evict pinned bos.
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> #v6
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 345 ++++++++++++-----------------
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c | 21 +-
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h | 8 +-
3 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 231 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index f4b2b2bea6cb..0131ec802066 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -224,80 +224,6 @@ static void ttm_bo_flush_all_fences(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);
}
-/**
- * ttm_bo_cleanup_refs
- * If bo idle, remove from lru lists, and unref.
- * If not idle, block if possible.
- *
- * Must be called with lru_lock and reservation held, this function
- * will drop the lru lock and optionally the reservation lock before returning.
- *
- * @bo: The buffer object to clean-up
- * @interruptible: Any sleeps should occur interruptibly.
- * @no_wait_gpu: Never wait for gpu. Return -EBUSY instead.
- * @unlock_resv: Unlock the reservation lock as well.
- */
-
-static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
- bool interruptible, bool no_wait_gpu,
- bool unlock_resv)
-{
- struct dma_resv *resv = &bo->base._resv;
- int ret;
-
- if (dma_resv_test_signaled(resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP))
- ret = 0;
- else
- ret = -EBUSY;
-
- if (ret && !no_wait_gpu) {
- long lret;
-
- if (unlock_resv)
- dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
- spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
-
- lret = dma_resv_wait_timeout(resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP,
- interruptible,
- 30 * HZ);
-
- if (lret < 0)
- return lret;
- else if (lret == 0)
- return -EBUSY;
-
- spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
- if (unlock_resv && !dma_resv_trylock(bo->base.resv)) {
- /*
- * We raced, and lost, someone else holds the reservation now,
- * and is probably busy in ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use.
- *
- * Even if it's not the case, because we finished waiting any
- * delayed destruction would succeed, so just return success
- * here.
- */
- spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
- return 0;
- }
- ret = 0;
- }
-
- if (ret) {
- if (unlock_resv)
- dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
- spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
- return ret;
- }
-
- spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
- ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(bo);
-
- if (unlock_resv)
- dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* Block for the dma_resv object to become idle, lock the buffer and clean up
* the resource and tt object.
@@ -505,151 +431,152 @@ bool ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_eviction_valuable);
-/*
- * Check the target bo is allowable to be evicted or swapout, including cases:
- *
- * a. if share same reservation object with ctx->resv, have assumption
- * reservation objects should already be locked, so not lock again and
- * return true directly when either the opreation allow_reserved_eviction
- * or the target bo already is in delayed free list;
+/**
+ * ttm_bo_evict_first() - Evict the first bo on the manager's LRU list.
+ * @bdev: The ttm device.
+ * @man: The manager whose bo to evict.
+ * @ctx: The TTM operation ctx governing the eviction.
*
- * b. Otherwise, trylock it.
+ * Return: 0 if successful or the resource disappeared. Negative error code on error.
*/
-static bool ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
- struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
- const struct ttm_place *place,
- bool *locked, bool *busy)
+int ttm_bo_evict_first(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
{
- bool ret = false;
+ struct ttm_resource_cursor cursor;
+ struct ttm_buffer_object *bo;
+ struct ttm_resource *res;
+ unsigned int mem_type;
+ int ret = 0;
- if (bo->pin_count) {
- *locked = false;
- if (busy)
- *busy = false;
- return false;
+ spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+ res = ttm_resource_manager_first(man, &cursor);
+ ttm_resource_cursor_fini(&cursor);
+ if (!res) {
+ ret = -ENOENT;
+ goto out_no_ref;
}
+ bo = res->bo;
+ if (!ttm_bo_get_unless_zero(bo))
+ goto out_no_ref;
+ mem_type = res->mem_type;
+ spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+ ret = ttm_bo_reserve(bo, ctx->interruptible, ctx->no_wait_gpu, NULL);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_no_lock;
+ if (!bo->resource || bo->resource->mem_type != mem_type)
+ goto out_bo_moved;
- if (bo->base.resv == ctx->resv) {
- dma_resv_assert_held(bo->base.resv);
- if (ctx->allow_res_evict)
- ret = true;
- *locked = false;
- if (busy)
- *busy = false;
+ if (bo->deleted) {
+ ret = ttm_bo_wait_ctx(bo, ctx);
+ if (!ret)
+ ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(bo);
} else {
- ret = dma_resv_trylock(bo->base.resv);
- *locked = ret;
- if (busy)
- *busy = !ret;
- }
-
- if (ret && place && (bo->resource->mem_type != place->mem_type ||
- !bo->bdev->funcs->eviction_valuable(bo, place))) {
- ret = false;
- if (*locked) {
- dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
- *locked = false;
- }
+ ret = ttm_bo_evict(bo, ctx);
}
+out_bo_moved:
+ dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
+out_no_lock:
+ ttm_bo_put(bo);
+ return ret;
+out_no_ref:
+ spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
return ret;
}
/**
- * ttm_mem_evict_wait_busy - wait for a busy BO to become available
- *
- * @busy_bo: BO which couldn't be locked with trylock
- * @ctx: operation context
- * @ticket: acquire ticket
- *
- * Try to lock a busy buffer object to avoid failing eviction.
+ * struct ttm_bo_evict_walk - Parameters for the evict walk.
*/
-static int ttm_mem_evict_wait_busy(struct ttm_buffer_object *busy_bo,
- struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket)
-{
- int r;
-
- if (!busy_bo || !ticket)
- return -EBUSY;
-
- if (ctx->interruptible)
- r = dma_resv_lock_interruptible(busy_bo->base.resv,
- ticket);
- else
- r = dma_resv_lock(busy_bo->base.resv, ticket);
-
- /*
- * TODO: It would be better to keep the BO locked until allocation is at
- * least tried one more time, but that would mean a much larger rework
- * of TTM.
- */
- if (!r)
- dma_resv_unlock(busy_bo->base.resv);
-
- return r == -EDEADLK ? -EBUSY : r;
-}
+struct ttm_bo_evict_walk {
+ /** @walk: The walk base parameters. */
+ struct ttm_lru_walk walk;
+ /** @place: The place passed to the resource allocation. */
+ const struct ttm_place *place;
+ /** @evictor: The buffer object we're trying to make room for. */
+ struct ttm_buffer_object *evictor;
+ /** @res: The allocated resource if any. */
+ struct ttm_resource **res;
+ /** @evicted: Number of successful evictions. */
+ unsigned long evicted;
+};
-int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_device *bdev,
- struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
- const struct ttm_place *place,
- struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket)
+static s64 ttm_bo_evict_cb(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
{
- struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = NULL, *busy_bo = NULL;
- struct ttm_resource_cursor cursor;
- struct ttm_resource *res;
- bool locked = false;
- int ret;
+ struct ttm_bo_evict_walk *evict_walk =
+ container_of(walk, typeof(*evict_walk), walk);
+ s64 lret;
- spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
- ttm_resource_manager_for_each_res(man, &cursor, res) {
- bool busy;
-
- if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(res->bo, ctx, place,
- &locked, &busy)) {
- if (busy && !busy_bo && ticket !=
- dma_resv_locking_ctx(res->bo->base.resv))
- busy_bo = res->bo;
- continue;
- }
+ if (bo->pin_count || !bo->bdev->funcs->eviction_valuable(bo, evict_walk->place))
+ return 0;
- if (ttm_bo_get_unless_zero(res->bo)) {
- bo = res->bo;
- break;
- }
- if (locked)
- dma_resv_unlock(res->bo->base.resv);
+ if (bo->deleted) {
+ lret = ttm_bo_wait_ctx(bo, walk->ctx);
+ if (!lret)
+ ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(bo);
+ } else {
+ lret = ttm_bo_evict(bo, walk->ctx);
}
- ttm_resource_cursor_fini(&cursor);
- if (!bo) {
- if (busy_bo && !ttm_bo_get_unless_zero(busy_bo))
- busy_bo = NULL;
- spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
- ret = ttm_mem_evict_wait_busy(busy_bo, ctx, ticket);
- if (busy_bo)
- ttm_bo_put(busy_bo);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (lret)
+ goto out;
- if (bo->deleted) {
- ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(bo, ctx->interruptible,
- ctx->no_wait_gpu, locked);
- ttm_bo_put(bo);
- return ret;
- }
+ evict_walk->evicted++;
+ if (evict_walk->res)
+ lret = ttm_resource_alloc(evict_walk->evictor, evict_walk->place,
+ evict_walk->res);
+ if (lret == 0)
+ return 1;
+out:
+ /* Errors that should terminate the walk. */
+ if (lret == -ENOSPC)
+ return -EBUSY;
- spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+ return lret;
+}
- ret = ttm_bo_evict(bo, ctx);
- if (locked)
- ttm_bo_unreserve(bo);
- else
- ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail_unlocked(bo);
+static const struct ttm_lru_walk_ops ttm_evict_walk_ops = {
+ .process_bo = ttm_bo_evict_cb,
+};
- ttm_bo_put(bo);
- return ret;
+static int ttm_bo_evict_alloc(struct ttm_device *bdev,
+ struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
+ const struct ttm_place *place,
+ struct ttm_buffer_object *evictor,
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket,
+ struct ttm_resource **res)
+{
+ struct ttm_bo_evict_walk evict_walk = {
+ .walk = {
+ .ops = &ttm_evict_walk_ops,
+ .ctx = ctx,
+ .ticket = ticket,
+ },
+ .place = place,
+ .evictor = evictor,
+ .res = res,
+ };
+ s64 lret;
+
+ evict_walk.walk.trylock_only = true;
+ lret = ttm_lru_walk_for_evict(&evict_walk.walk, bdev, man, 1);
+ if (lret || !ticket)
+ goto out;
+
+ /* If ticket-locking, repeat while making progress. */
+ evict_walk.walk.trylock_only = false;
+ do {
+ /* The walk may clear the evict_walk.walk.ticket field */
+ evict_walk.walk.ticket = ticket;
+ evict_walk.evicted = 0;
+ lret = ttm_lru_walk_for_evict(&evict_walk.walk, bdev, man, 1);
+ } while (!lret && evict_walk.evicted);
+out:
+ if (lret < 0)
+ return lret;
+ if (lret == 0)
+ return -EBUSY;
+ return 0;
}
/**
@@ -760,6 +687,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_alloc_resource(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
for (i = 0; i < placement->num_placement; ++i) {
const struct ttm_place *place = &placement->placement[i];
struct ttm_resource_manager *man;
+ bool may_evict;
man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, place->mem_type);
if (!man || !ttm_resource_manager_used(man))
@@ -769,22 +697,21 @@ static int ttm_bo_alloc_resource(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
TTM_PL_FLAG_FALLBACK))
continue;
- do {
- ret = ttm_resource_alloc(bo, place, res);
- if (unlikely(ret && ret != -ENOSPC))
+ may_evict = (force_space && place->mem_type != TTM_PL_SYSTEM);
+ ret = ttm_resource_alloc(bo, place, res);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret != -ENOSPC)
return ret;
- if (likely(!ret) || !force_space)
- break;
-
- ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, man, place, ctx,
- ticket);
- if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY))
- break;
- if (unlikely(ret))
+ if (!may_evict)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = ttm_bo_evict_alloc(bdev, man, place, bo, ctx,
+ ticket, res);
+ if (ret == -EBUSY)
+ continue;
+ if (ret)
return ret;
- } while (1);
- if (ret)
- continue;
+ }
ret = ttm_bo_add_move_fence(bo, man, ctx->no_wait_gpu);
if (unlikely(ret)) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
index b43d04a1dc91..6d764ba88aab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
@@ -495,24 +495,11 @@ int ttm_resource_manager_evict_all(struct ttm_device *bdev,
};
struct dma_fence *fence;
int ret;
- unsigned i;
-
- /*
- * Can't use standard list traversal since we're unlocking.
- */
- spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
- for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
- while (!list_empty(&man->lru[i])) {
- spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
- ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, man, NULL, &ctx,
- NULL);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
- }
- }
- spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+ do {
+ ret = ttm_bo_evict_first(bdev, man, &ctx);
+ cond_resched();
+ } while (!ret);
spin_lock(&man->move_lock);
fence = dma_fence_get(man->move);
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
index eb2692de06b8..d1a732d56259 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
@@ -422,11 +422,9 @@ s64 ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
s64 target);
void ttm_bo_pin(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
void ttm_bo_unpin(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
-int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_device *bdev,
- struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
- const struct ttm_place *place,
- struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
- struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket);
+int ttm_bo_evict_first(struct ttm_device *bdev,
+ struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx);
vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_reserve(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
struct vm_fault *vmf);
vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(struct vm_fault *vmf,
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-05 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-05 15:31 [PATCH v7 0/8] TTM LRU-walk cherry-picks Thomas Hellström
2024-07-05 15:31 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] drm/ttm: Allow TTM LRU list nodes of different types Thomas Hellström
2024-07-05 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] drm/ttm: Slightly clean up LRU list iteration Thomas Hellström
2024-07-05 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] drm/ttm: Use LRU hitches Thomas Hellström
2024-07-05 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] drm/ttm, drm/amdgpu, drm/xe: Consider hitch moves within bulk sublist moves Thomas Hellström
2024-07-05 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] drm/ttm: Provide a generic LRU walker helper Thomas Hellström
2024-07-05 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] drm/ttm: Use the LRU walker helper for swapping Thomas Hellström
2024-07-05 15:32 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2024-07-05 15:32 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] drm/ttm: Balance ttm_resource_cursor_init() and ttm_resource_cursor_fini() Thomas Hellström
2024-07-06 4:45 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-08 15:18 ` Matthew Brost
2024-07-05 15:43 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for TTM LRU-walk cherry-picks Patchwork
2024-07-05 15:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-07-05 15:44 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-07-05 15:56 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-07-05 15:58 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-07-05 16:00 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-07-05 16:23 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-07-05 19:16 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240705153206.68526-8-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Amaranath.Somalapuram@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.