All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH mm-unstable v1 3/5] mm/swap: fold lru_rotate into cpu_fbatches
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 20:13:15 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240711021317.596178-4-yuzhao@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711021317.596178-1-yuzhao@google.com>

Fold lru_rotate into cpu_fbatches, and rename the folio_batch and the
lock protecting it to lru_move_tail and lock_irq respectively so that
all the boilerplate can be removed at the end of this series.

Also remove data_race() around folio_batch_count(), which is out of
place: all folio_batch_count() calls on remote cpu_fbatches are
subject to data_race(), and therefore data_race() should be inside
folio_batch_count().

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
---
 mm/swap.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index e4745b88a964..774ae9eab1e6 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -47,20 +47,11 @@
 int page_cluster;
 const int page_cluster_max = 31;
 
-/* Protecting only lru_rotate.fbatch which requires disabling interrupts */
-struct lru_rotate {
-	local_lock_t lock;
-	struct folio_batch fbatch;
-};
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct lru_rotate, lru_rotate) = {
-	.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
-};
-
-/*
- * The following folio batches are grouped together because they are protected
- * by disabling preemption (and interrupts remain enabled).
- */
 struct cpu_fbatches {
+	/*
+	 * The following folio batches are grouped together because they are protected
+	 * by disabling preemption (and interrupts remain enabled).
+	 */
 	local_lock_t lock;
 	struct folio_batch lru_add;
 	struct folio_batch lru_deactivate_file;
@@ -69,9 +60,14 @@ struct cpu_fbatches {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	struct folio_batch lru_activate;
 #endif
+	/* Protecting the following batches which require disabling interrupts */
+	local_lock_t lock_irq;
+	struct folio_batch lru_move_tail;
 };
+
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_fbatches, cpu_fbatches) = {
 	.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock),
+	.lock_irq = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lock_irq),
 };
 
 static void __page_cache_release(struct folio *folio, struct lruvec **lruvecp,
@@ -267,10 +263,10 @@ void folio_rotate_reclaimable(struct folio *folio)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	local_lock_irqsave(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
-	fbatch = this_cpu_ptr(&lru_rotate.fbatch);
+	local_lock_irqsave(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
+	fbatch = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_fbatches.lru_move_tail);
 	folio_batch_add_and_move(fbatch, folio, lru_move_tail_fn);
-	local_unlock_irqrestore(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+	local_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
 }
 
 void lru_note_cost(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file,
@@ -668,15 +664,15 @@ void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu)
 	if (folio_batch_count(fbatch))
 		folio_batch_move_lru(fbatch, lru_add_fn);
 
-	fbatch = &per_cpu(lru_rotate.fbatch, cpu);
+	fbatch = &fbatches->lru_move_tail;
 	/* Disabling interrupts below acts as a compiler barrier. */
 	if (data_race(folio_batch_count(fbatch))) {
 		unsigned long flags;
 
 		/* No harm done if a racing interrupt already did this */
-		local_lock_irqsave(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+		local_lock_irqsave(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
 		folio_batch_move_lru(fbatch, lru_move_tail_fn);
-		local_unlock_irqrestore(&lru_rotate.lock, flags);
+		local_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_fbatches.lock_irq, flags);
 	}
 
 	fbatch = &fbatches->lru_deactivate_file;
@@ -825,7 +821,7 @@ static bool cpu_needs_drain(unsigned int cpu)
 
 	/* Check these in order of likelihood that they're not zero */
 	return folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_add) ||
-		data_race(folio_batch_count(&per_cpu(lru_rotate.fbatch, cpu))) ||
+		folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_move_tail) ||
 		folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_deactivate_file) ||
 		folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_deactivate) ||
 		folio_batch_count(&fbatches->lru_lazyfree) ||
-- 
2.45.2.803.g4e1b14247a-goog



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-11  2:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-11  2:13 [PATCH mm-unstable v1 0/5] mm/swap: remove boilerplate Yu Zhao
2024-07-11  2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 1/5] mm/swap: reduce indentation level Yu Zhao
2024-07-11  2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 2/5] mm/swap: rename cpu_fbatches->activate Yu Zhao
2024-07-11  2:13 ` Yu Zhao [this message]
2024-07-11  2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 4/5] mm/swap: remove remaining _fn suffix Yu Zhao
2024-07-11  2:13 ` [PATCH mm-unstable v1 5/5] mm/swap: remove boilerplate Yu Zhao
2024-07-26  5:48   ` Barry Song
2024-07-26  5:56     ` Barry Song
2024-07-26  6:50       ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-04  6:55   ` Hugh Dickins
2024-08-04 21:36     ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-05 19:14       ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240711021317.596178-4-yuzhao@google.com \
    --to=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.