From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6245978283; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 08:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720687385; cv=none; b=OWw5wu+TP44wJI6WIhK1Zt9gO9/2wMBjWaLCSCBuxHs0bxtJh0/JbOSzm96hrzIzMGmnudIzKKwNOjreoadJSZgpmltANZ1qY3ZS1kWz24DEcu+Mua8iLcQDVpiLq8ELsAmnDD5Dv8J56ZIehI30YBOqSZytro4EmDYyBE05Jbk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720687385; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OL4eMLIAlEEIyeP5j2TAdnY8as6JlFOV8HUyYszQARA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OiULG09MBurnrhGoFqXrWDy+uDyoyMGc8HdcE/6XY8do56PPicFNaU1NO0PDqCYFnm4jZDux6U2NAnaq0jbbzdhTMH4CCbi7tpnULLXNpVnvt9Mbhpuo23Y7KU28LTjhBNrfQ3vCF8CGgWJP4htzWQGjDbnaUBKY5L8chHjruVo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=vFKvySYO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="vFKvySYO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D926BC116B1; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 08:43:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720687385; bh=OL4eMLIAlEEIyeP5j2TAdnY8as6JlFOV8HUyYszQARA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vFKvySYOkZqFLvjtDMVDDC3owPWrlfU/70Mh723bXbR054nGZKVgKBCdEuoyISOlp gV/+ut4uccROqJPvbShJ1vxfT9Dc41+bZg6+5MhUNOX+XTxWI8BU0aIzM2qO6S95L7 rQweihii33oJlxoV+A/TfhbG/3bN7Gv8TZtJA2IsnWXCVRp2wb35WY2lEEBpcbf59K a7/LvnLowWuhPLqVMEwMHL4QBNVw/UssOINyuZ6U9TzbIDY/0ck1hvHksKmmt7FHkT aRcZkX7DXr/6qQuFQVZj7helOTMx6+21ZqxV8j/DlZakN9z2fPfTU4gWjaJO8JgJv+ nHO5HPtPVwSYw== Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:43:00 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Kory Maincent Cc: Andrew Lunn , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Oleksij Rempel , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: pse-pd: Do not return EOPNOSUPP if config is null Message-ID: <20240711084300.GA8788@kernel.org> References: <20240710114232.257190-1-kory.maincent@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240710114232.257190-1-kory.maincent@bootlin.com> On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 01:42:30PM +0200, Kory Maincent wrote: > For a PSE supporting both c33 and PoDL, setting config for one type of PoE > leaves the other type's config null. Currently, this case returns > EOPNOTSUPP, which is incorrect. Instead, we should do nothing if the > configuration is empty. > > Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent > Fixes: d83e13761d5b ("net: pse-pd: Use regulator framework within PSE framework") > --- > > Changes in v2: > - New patch to fix dealing with a null config. Hi Kory, A few thing from a process perspective: 1. As fixes, with fixes tags (good!), this patchset seems like it is appropriate for net rather than net-next. And indeed it applies to net but not net-next. However, the absence of a target tree confuses our CI which failed to apply the patchset to net-next. Probably this means it should be reposted, targeted at net. Subject: [Patch v3 net x/y] ... See: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html 2. Please provide a cover letter for patch sets with more than one (but not just one) patch. That provides an overview of how the patches relate to each other. And a convenient anchor for feedback such as point 1 above. ...