From: Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: chandan.babu@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org,
Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: remove unused parameter in macro XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 07:27:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240721112701.212342-1-sunjunchao2870@gmail.com> (raw)
In the macro definition of XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES, a parameter is accepted,
but it is not used. Hence, it should be removed.
This patch has only passed compilation test, but it should be fine.
Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h | 2 +-
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h
index cb035da3f990..fb05f44f6c75 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_quota_defs.h
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ typedef uint8_t xfs_dqtype_t;
* And, of course, we also need to take into account the dquot log format item
* used to describe each dquot.
*/
-#define XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) \
+#define XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES \
((sizeof(struct xfs_dq_logformat) + sizeof(struct xfs_disk_dquot)) * 6)
#define XFS_IS_QUOTA_ON(mp) ((mp)->m_qflags & XFS_ALL_QUOTA_ACCT)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
index 3dc8f785bf29..45aaf169806a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
@@ -338,11 +338,11 @@ xfs_calc_write_reservation(
blksz);
t1 += adj;
t3 += adj;
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + max3(t1, t2, t3);
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES + max3(t1, t2, t3);
}
t4 = xfs_calc_refcountbt_reservation(mp, 1);
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + max(t4, max3(t1, t2, t3));
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES + max(t4, max3(t1, t2, t3));
}
unsigned int
@@ -410,11 +410,11 @@ xfs_calc_itruncate_reservation(
xfs_refcountbt_block_count(mp, 4),
blksz);
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + max3(t1, t2, t3);
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES + max3(t1, t2, t3);
}
t4 = xfs_calc_refcountbt_reservation(mp, 2);
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) + max(t4, max3(t1, t2, t3));
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES + max(t4, max3(t1, t2, t3));
}
unsigned int
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_rename_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
+ unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES;
struct xfs_trans_resv *resp = M_RES(mp);
unsigned int t1, t2, t3 = 0;
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_link_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
+ unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES;
struct xfs_trans_resv *resp = M_RES(mp);
unsigned int t1, t2, t3 = 0;
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_remove_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
+ unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES;
struct xfs_trans_resv *resp = M_RES(mp);
unsigned int t1, t2, t3 = 0;
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ xfs_calc_icreate_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
struct xfs_trans_resv *resp = M_RES(mp);
- unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
+ unsigned int overhead = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES;
unsigned int t1, t2, t3 = 0;
t1 = xfs_calc_icreate_resv_alloc(mp);
@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_create_tmpfile_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- uint res = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp);
+ uint res = XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES;
res += xfs_calc_icreate_resv_alloc(mp);
return res + xfs_calc_iunlink_add_reservation(mp);
@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_ifree_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES +
xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(3, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
xfs_calc_iunlink_remove_reservation(mp) +
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_ichange_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES +
xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(1, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize);
@@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_addafork_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES +
xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(2, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(1, mp->m_dir_geo->blksize) +
@@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_attrsetm_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES +
xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(1, mp->m_sb.sb_sectsize) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH, XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1));
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ STATIC uint
xfs_calc_attrrm_reservation(
struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
- return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES(mp) +
+ return XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES +
max((xfs_calc_inode_res(mp, 1) +
xfs_calc_buf_res(XFS_DA_NODE_MAXDEPTH,
XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, 1)) +
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-21 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-21 11:27 Julian Sun [this message]
2024-07-23 2:20 ` [PATCH] xfs: remove unused parameter in macro XFS_DQUOT_LOGRES Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240721112701.212342-1-sunjunchao2870@gmail.com \
--to=sunjunchao2870@gmail.com \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.