From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: brauner@kernel.org,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,houtao1@huawei.com,hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com,libaokun1@huawei.com,libaokun@huaweicloud.com,patches@lists.linux.dev,sashal@kernel.org,yangerkun@huawei.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie()" has been added to the 6.9-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:53:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024072346-track-dispatch-b856@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240719132812.1542957-3-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie()
to the 6.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cachefiles-fix-slab-use-after-free-in-cachefiles_withdraw_cookie.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From stable+bounces-60607-greg=kroah.com@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 19 15:31:16 2024
From: libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 21:28:12 +0800
Subject: cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie()
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sashal@kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, libaokun1@huawei.com, Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <20240719132812.1542957-3-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
From: libaokun@huaweicloud.com
From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
[ Upstream commit 5d8f805789072ea7fd39504694b7bd17e5f751c4 ]
We got the following issue in our fault injection stress test:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie+0x4d9/0x600
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888118efc000 by task kworker/u78:0/109
CPU: 13 PID: 109 Comm: kworker/u78:0 Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #566
Call Trace:
<TASK>
kasan_report+0x93/0xc0
cachefiles_withdraw_cookie+0x4d9/0x600
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230
fscache_cookie_worker+0x91/0x1c0
process_one_work+0x7fa/0x1800
[...]
Allocated by task 117:
kmalloc_trace+0x1b3/0x3c0
cachefiles_acquire_volume+0xf3/0x9c0
fscache_create_volume_work+0x97/0x150
process_one_work+0x7fa/0x1800
[...]
Freed by task 120301:
kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
cachefiles_withdraw_cache+0x3fa/0x920
cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount+0x1f6/0x250
cachefiles_daemon_release+0x13b/0x290
__fput+0x204/0xa00
task_work_run+0x139/0x230
do_exit+0x87a/0x29b0
[...]
==================================================================
Following is the process that triggers the issue:
p1 | p2
------------------------------------------------------------
fscache_begin_lookup
fscache_begin_volume_access
fscache_cache_is_live(fscache_cache)
cachefiles_daemon_release
cachefiles_put_unbind_pincount
cachefiles_daemon_unbind
cachefiles_withdraw_cache
fscache_withdraw_cache
fscache_set_cache_state(cache, FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN);
cachefiles_withdraw_objects(cache)
fscache_wait_for_objects(fscache)
atomic_read(&fscache_cache->object_count) == 0
fscache_perform_lookup
cachefiles_lookup_cookie
cachefiles_alloc_object
refcount_set(&object->ref, 1);
object->volume = volume
fscache_count_object(vcookie->cache);
atomic_inc(&fscache_cache->object_count)
cachefiles_withdraw_volumes
cachefiles_withdraw_volume
fscache_withdraw_volume
__cachefiles_free_volume
kfree(cachefiles_volume)
fscache_cookie_state_machine
cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
cache = object->volume->cache;
// cachefiles_volume UAF !!!
After setting FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN, wait for all the cookie lookups
to complete first, and then wait for fscache_cache->object_count == 0 to
avoid the cookie exiting after the volume has been freed and triggering
the above issue. Therefore call fscache_withdraw_volume() before calling
cachefiles_withdraw_objects().
This way, after setting FSCACHE_CACHE_IS_WITHDRAWN, only the following two
cases will occur:
1) fscache_begin_lookup fails in fscache_begin_volume_access().
2) fscache_withdraw_volume() will ensure that fscache_count_object() has
been executed before calling fscache_wait_for_objects().
Fixes: fe2140e2f57f ("cachefiles: Implement volume support")
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240628062930.2467993-4-libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/cachefiles/cache.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
fs/cachefiles/volume.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/cachefiles/cache.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/cache.c
@@ -313,7 +313,39 @@ static void cachefiles_withdraw_objects(
}
/*
- * Withdraw volumes.
+ * Withdraw fscache volumes.
+ */
+static void cachefiles_withdraw_fscache_volumes(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
+{
+ struct list_head *cur;
+ struct cachefiles_volume *volume;
+ struct fscache_volume *vcookie;
+
+ _enter("");
+retry:
+ spin_lock(&cache->object_list_lock);
+ list_for_each(cur, &cache->volumes) {
+ volume = list_entry(cur, struct cachefiles_volume, cache_link);
+
+ if (atomic_read(&volume->vcookie->n_accesses) == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ vcookie = fscache_try_get_volume(volume->vcookie,
+ fscache_volume_get_withdraw);
+ if (vcookie) {
+ spin_unlock(&cache->object_list_lock);
+ fscache_withdraw_volume(vcookie);
+ fscache_put_volume(vcookie, fscache_volume_put_withdraw);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&cache->object_list_lock);
+
+ _leave("");
+}
+
+/*
+ * Withdraw cachefiles volumes.
*/
static void cachefiles_withdraw_volumes(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
{
@@ -381,6 +413,7 @@ void cachefiles_withdraw_cache(struct ca
pr_info("File cache on %s unregistering\n", fscache->name);
fscache_withdraw_cache(fscache);
+ cachefiles_withdraw_fscache_volumes(cache);
/* we now have to destroy all the active objects pertaining to this
* cache - which we do by passing them off to thread pool to be
--- a/fs/cachefiles/volume.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/volume.c
@@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ void cachefiles_free_volume(struct fscac
void cachefiles_withdraw_volume(struct cachefiles_volume *volume)
{
- fscache_withdraw_volume(volume->vcookie);
cachefiles_set_volume_xattr(volume);
__cachefiles_free_volume(volume);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from kroah.com@vger.kernel.org are
queue-6.9/cachefiles-fix-slab-use-after-free-in-cachefiles_withdraw_cookie.patch
queue-6.9/cachefiles-fix-slab-use-after-free-in-fscache_withdraw_volume.patch
queue-6.9/netfs-fscache-export-fscache_put_volume-and-add-fscache_try_get_volume.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-23 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-19 13:28 [PATCH 6.9 1/3] netfs, fscache: export fscache_put_volume() and add fscache_try_get_volume() libaokun
2024-07-19 13:28 ` [PATCH 6.9 2/3] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in fscache_withdraw_volume() libaokun
2024-07-23 13:53 ` Patch "cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in fscache_withdraw_volume()" has been added to the 6.9-stable tree gregkh
2024-07-19 13:28 ` [PATCH 6.9 3/3] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_withdraw_cookie() libaokun
2024-07-23 13:53 ` gregkh [this message]
2024-07-23 13:53 ` Patch "netfs, fscache: export fscache_put_volume() and add fscache_try_get_volume()" has been added to the 6.9-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024072346-track-dispatch-b856@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.