All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: aaptel@suse.com,dhowells@redhat.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,jlayton@kernel.org,netfs@lists.linux.dev,pc@manguebit.com,smfrench@gmail.com,stfrench@microsoft.com,tom@talpey.com
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cifs: Fix server re-repick on subrequest retry" has been added to the 6.10-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 13:23:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024072354-drained-vision-44ea@gregkh> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    cifs: Fix server re-repick on subrequest retry

to the 6.10-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     cifs-fix-server-re-repick-on-subrequest-retry.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.10 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


From de40579b903883274fe203865f29d66b168b7236 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 20:19:32 +0100
Subject: cifs: Fix server re-repick on subrequest retry

From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

commit de40579b903883274fe203865f29d66b168b7236 upstream.

When a subrequest is marked for needing retry, netfs will call
cifs_prepare_write() which will make cifs repick the server for the op
before renegotiating credits; it then calls cifs_issue_write() which
invokes smb2_async_writev() - which re-repicks the server.

If a different server is then selected, this causes the increment of
server->in_flight to happen against one record and the decrement to happen
against another, leading to misaccounting.

Fix this by just removing the repick code in smb2_async_writev().  As this
is only called from netfslib-driven code, cifs_prepare_write() should
always have been called first, and so server should never be NULL and the
preparatory step is repeated in the event that we do a retry.

The problem manifests as a warning looking something like:

 WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 72896 at fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c:97 smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs]
 ...
 RIP: 0010:smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs]
 ...
  smb2_writev_callback+0x334/0x560 [cifs]
  cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x77a/0x11b0 [cifs]
  kthread+0x187/0x1d0
  ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60
  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

Which may be triggered by a number of different xfstests running against an
Azure server in multichannel mode.  generic/249 seems the most repeatable,
but generic/215, generic/249 and generic/308 may also show it.

Fixes: 3ee1a1fc3981 ("cifs: Cut over to using netfslib")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (Red Hat) <pc@manguebit.com>
Acked-by: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@suse.com>
cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c b/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c
index 2ae2dbb6202b..bb84a89e5905 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c
@@ -4859,9 +4859,6 @@ smb2_async_writev(struct cifs_io_subrequest *wdata)
 	struct cifs_io_parms *io_parms = NULL;
 	int credit_request;
 
-	if (!wdata->server || test_bit(NETFS_SREQ_RETRYING, &wdata->subreq.flags))
-		server = wdata->server = cifs_pick_channel(tcon->ses);
-
 	/*
 	 * in future we may get cifs_io_parms passed in from the caller,
 	 * but for now we construct it here...
-- 
2.45.2



Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dhowells@redhat.com are

queue-6.10/cifs-fix-server-re-repick-on-subrequest-retry.patch
queue-6.10/cifs-fix-setting-of-zero_point-after-dio-write.patch
queue-6.10/cifs-fix-missing-error-code-set.patch
queue-6.10/cifs-fix-missing-fscache-invalidation.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2024-07-23 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024072354-drained-vision-44ea@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=aaptel@suse.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.com \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.