From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
"André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peter Griffin" <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the phy-next tree with the samsung-krzk tree
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:14:58 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240724091458.3052dc6f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240703141932.47e51748@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1676 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:19:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the phy-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 85863cee8ce0 ("soc: samsung: exynos-pmu: add support for PMU_ALIVE non atomic registers")
>
> from the samsung-krzk tree and commit:
>
> 32267c29bc7d ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support Exynos USBDRD 3.1 combo phy (HS & SS)")
>
> from the phy-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> index f411c176536d,6765160eaab2..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> @@@ -657,8 -657,8 +657,12 @@@
> #define EXYNOS5433_PAD_RETENTION_UFS_OPTION (0x3268)
> #define EXYNOS5433_PAD_RETENTION_FSYSGENIO_OPTION (0x32A8)
>
> +/* For Tensor GS101 */
> +#define GS101_SYSIP_DAT0 (0x810)
> +#define GS101_SYSTEM_CONFIGURATION (0x3A00)
> +
> + /* For GS101 */
> + #define GS101_PHY_CTRL_USB20 0x3eb0
> + #define GS101_PHY_CTRL_USBDP 0x3eb4
> +
> #endif /* __LINUX_SOC_EXYNOS_REGS_PMU_H */
This is now a conflict between he phy-next tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-23 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-03 4:19 linux-next: manual merge of the phy-next tree with the samsung-krzk tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-23 23:14 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2024-07-24 8:57 ` André Draszik
2024-07-24 9:00 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240724091458.3052dc6f@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.