Re: [PATCH] smp: print only local CPU info when sched_clock goes backward

[Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:07:30AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 01:49:41PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > About 40% of all csd_lock warnings observed in our fleet appear to
> > be due to sched_clock() going backward in time (usually only a little
> > bit), resulting in ts0 being larger than ts2.
> > 
> > When the local CPU is at fault, we should print out a message reflecting
> > that, rather than trying to get the remote CPU's stack trace.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> 
> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> 

I have included this patch as part of the CSD-lock diagnostics series
which is submitted for review and planned for v6.12 [1]. I have also
included it in RCU tree [2] for more testing.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240722133559.GA667117@neeraj.linux/
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/neeraj.upadhyay/linux-rcu.git/log/?h=next


- Neeraj

> > ---
> >  kernel/smp.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> > index f085ebcdf9e7..5656ef63ea82 100644
> > --- a/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -237,6 +237,14 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
> >  	if (likely(ts_delta <= csd_lock_timeout_ns || csd_lock_timeout_ns == 0))
> >  		return false;
> >  
> > +	if (ts0 > ts2) {
> > +		/* Our own sched_clock went backward; don't blame another CPU. */
> > +		ts_delta = ts0 - ts2;
> > +		pr_alert("sched_clock on CPU %d went backward by %llu ns\n", raw_smp_processor_id(), ts_delta);
> > +		*ts1 = ts2;
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	firsttime = !*bug_id;
> >  	if (firsttime)
> >  		*bug_id = atomic_inc_return(&csd_bug_count);
> > -- 
> > 2.45.2
> >