From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
brauner@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
willy@infradead.org, clm@fb.com, riel@surriel.com,
ffledgling@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC exit] Sleep at TASK_IDLE when waiting for application core dump
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 15:29:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240725132849.GA6602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1936bd18-775b-43e3-bfd5-2cd343565f06@paulmck-laptop>
On 07/24, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Currently, the coredump_task_exit() function sets the task state to
> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_FREEZABLE, which usually works well. But a
> combination of large memory and slow (and/or highly contended) mass
> storage can cause application core dumps to take more than two minutes,
> which can triggers "task blocked" splats.
Do you mean check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks() ?
In any case,
> Therefore, change that TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE to TASK_IDLE.
...
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void coredump_task_exit(struct task_struct *tsk)
> complete(&core_state->startup);
>
> for (;;) {
> - set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_FREEZABLE);
> + set_current_state(TASK_IDLE|TASK_FREEZABLE);
To me this change makes sense regardless...
To some degree TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE is misleading, in that the task which
sleeps in coredump_task_exit() is _KILLABLE, although not "directly".
A SIGKILL sent to the coredumping process will interrupt the coredumping thread
(see the signal->core_state check in prepare_signal() and fatal_signal_pending()
check in dump_interrupted()) and then this thread will wakeup the threads sleeping
in coredump_task_exit(), see coredump_finish().
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-25 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-25 0:04 [PATCH RFC exit] Sleep at TASK_IDLE when waiting for application core dump Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-25 13:29 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-07-25 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-25 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240725132849.GA6602@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=ffledgling@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.