From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: qcom-ep: Move controller cleanups to qcom_pcie_perst_deassert()
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:25:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240729135547.GA35559@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98264d15-fb30-32e0-7eba-72b3a50347e0@quicinc.com>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 05:58:31PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
>
>
> On 7/29/2024 5:52 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > Currently, the endpoint cleanup function dw_pcie_ep_cleanup() and EPF
> > deinit notify function pci_epc_deinit_notify() are called during the
> > execution of qcom_pcie_perst_assert() i.e., when the host has asserted
> > PERST#. But quickly after this step, refclk will also be disabled by the
> > host.
> >
> > All of the Qcom endpoint SoCs supported as of now depend on the refclk from
> > the host for keeping the controller operational. Due to this limitation,
> > any access to the hardware registers in the absence of refclk will result
> > in a whole endpoint crash. Unfortunately, most of the controller cleanups
> > require accessing the hardware registers (like eDMA cleanup performed in
> > dw_pcie_ep_cleanup(), powering down MHI EPF etc...). So these cleanup
> > functions are currently causing the crash in the endpoint SoC once host
> > asserts PERST#.
> >
> > One way to address this issue is by generating the refclk in the endpoint
> > itself and not depending on the host. But that is not always possible as
> > some of the endpoint designs do require the endpoint to consume refclk from
> > the host (as I was told by the Qcom engineers).
> >
> > So let's fix this crash by moving the controller cleanups to the start of
> > the qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() function. qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() is
> > called whenever the host has deasserted PERST# and it is guaranteed that
> > the refclk would be active at this point. So at the start of this function,
> > the controller cleanup can be performed. Once finished, rest of the code
> > execution for PERST# deassert can continue as usual.
> >
> How about doing the cleanup as part of pme turnoff message.
> As host waits for L23 ready from the device side. we can use that time
> to cleanup the host before sending L23 ready.
>
Yes, but that's only applicable if the host properly powers down the device. But
it won't work in the case of host crash or host abrupt poweroff.
- Mani
> - Krishna Chaitanya.
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> > index 2319ff2ae9f6..e024b4dcd76d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> > @@ -186,6 +186,8 @@ struct qcom_pcie_ep_cfg {
> > * @link_status: PCIe Link status
> > * @global_irq: Qualcomm PCIe specific Global IRQ
> > * @perst_irq: PERST# IRQ
> > + * @cleanup_pending: Cleanup is pending for the controller (because refclk is
> > + * needed for cleanup)
> > */
> > struct qcom_pcie_ep {
> > struct dw_pcie pci;
> > @@ -214,6 +216,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie_ep {
> > enum qcom_pcie_ep_link_status link_status;
> > int global_irq;
> > int perst_irq;
> > + bool cleanup_pending;
> > };
> > static int qcom_pcie_ep_core_reset(struct qcom_pcie_ep *pcie_ep)
> > @@ -389,6 +392,12 @@ static int qcom_pcie_perst_deassert(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > + if (pcie_ep->cleanup_pending) {
> > + pci_epc_deinit_notify(pci->ep.epc);
> > + dw_pcie_ep_cleanup(&pci->ep);
> > + pcie_ep->cleanup_pending = false;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* Assert WAKE# to RC to indicate device is ready */
> > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pcie_ep->wake, 1);
> > usleep_range(WAKE_DELAY_US, WAKE_DELAY_US + 500);
> > @@ -522,10 +531,9 @@ static void qcom_pcie_perst_assert(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > {
> > struct qcom_pcie_ep *pcie_ep = to_pcie_ep(pci);
> > - pci_epc_deinit_notify(pci->ep.epc);
> > - dw_pcie_ep_cleanup(&pci->ep);
> > qcom_pcie_disable_resources(pcie_ep);
> > pcie_ep->link_status = QCOM_PCIE_EP_LINK_DISABLED;
> > + pcie_ep->cleanup_pending = true;
> > }
> > /* Common DWC controller ops */
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-29 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 12:22 [PATCH] PCI: qcom-ep: Move controller cleanups to qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-07-29 12:28 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2024-07-29 13:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-07-31 4:31 ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2024-08-13 20:28 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-08-21 21:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-01 16:35 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2024-08-15 22:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-16 5:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-08-16 19:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-08-17 2:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240729135547.GA35559@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.