From: Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com, kunal1.joshi@intel.com,
animesh.manna@intel.com, Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_vrr: Add new test to validate LOBF
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 17:32:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240731120215.2946412-3-jeevan.b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240731120215.2946412-1-jeevan.b@intel.com>
Validate refresh rate changes that appear to be stable but actually
change slightly in the VRR using the fixed refresh rate framework
for non-PSR scenarios.
v2: add PR check.
v3: update commit message and fix code structure.
v4: update logic using existing code.
Signed-off-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
---
tests/kms_vrr.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_vrr.c b/tests/kms_vrr.c
index 7e8885f16..851b8bbee 100644
--- a/tests/kms_vrr.c
+++ b/tests/kms_vrr.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
*/
#include "igt.h"
+#include "igt_psr.h"
#include "i915/intel_drrs.h"
#include "sw_sync.h"
#include <fcntl.h>
@@ -76,6 +77,11 @@
* without a full modeset.
* Functionality: LRR
*
+ * SUBTEST: lobf
+ * Description: Test to validate link-off between active frames in non-psr
+ * operation
+ * Functionality: LOBF
+ *
* SUBTEST: max-min
* Description: Oscillates between highest and lowest refresh each frame for
* manual flicker profiling
@@ -106,7 +112,8 @@ enum {
TEST_FASTSET = 1 << 7,
TEST_MAXMIN = 1 << 8,
TEST_CMRR = 1 << 9,
- TEST_NEGATIVE = 1 << 10,
+ TEST_LINK_OFF = 1 << 10,
+ TEST_NEGATIVE = 1 << 11,
};
enum {
@@ -129,6 +136,7 @@ typedef struct vtest_ns {
typedef struct data {
igt_display_t display;
int drm_fd;
+ int debugfs_fd;
igt_plane_t *primary;
igt_fb_t fb[2];
range_t range;
@@ -784,6 +792,27 @@ test_seamless_virtual_rr_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *outpu
}
}
+static void
+test_lobf(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
+{
+ uint64_t rate[] = {0};
+
+ rate[0] = rate_from_refresh(data->switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE].vrefresh);
+ prepare_test(data, output, pipe);
+ data->debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(data->drm_fd);
+
+ igt_info("LOBF test execution on %s, PIPE %s with VRR range: (%u-%u) Hz\n",
+ output->name, kmstest_pipe_name(pipe), data->range.min, data->range.max);
+
+ igt_output_override_mode(output, &data->switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE]);
+ flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate, 1, TEST_DURATION_NS);
+ igt_output_override_mode(output, &data->switch_modes[LOW_RR_MODE]);
+ rate[0] = rate_from_refresh(data->switch_modes[LOW_RR_MODE].vrefresh);
+ flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate, 1, NSECS_PER_SEC);
+ igt_assert_f(igt_get_i915_edp_lobf_status(data->drm_fd, output->name),
+ "LOBF not enabled\n");
+}
+
static void
test_cmrr(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
{
@@ -843,6 +872,8 @@ static void test_cleanup(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output)
static bool output_constraint(data_t *data, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
{
+ data->debugfs_fd = igt_debugfs_dir(data->drm_fd);
+
if ((flags & (TEST_SEAMLESS_VRR | TEST_SEAMLESS_DRRS | TEST_CMRR)) &&
output->config.connector->connector_type != DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
return false;
@@ -852,6 +883,20 @@ static bool output_constraint(data_t *data, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags
igt_info("Selected panel won't support DRRS.\n");
return false;
}
+ if ((flags & TEST_LINK_OFF) &&
+ output->config.connector->connector_type != DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
+ return false;
+
+ if ((flags & TEST_LINK_OFF) &&
+ (psr_sink_support(data->drm_fd, data->debugfs_fd, PSR_MODE_1, NULL) ||
+ psr_sink_support(data->drm_fd, data->debugfs_fd, PR_MODE, NULL)))
+ psr_disable(data->drm_fd, data->debugfs_fd, NULL);
+
+ if ((flags & TEST_LINK_OFF) &&
+ igt_get_i915_edp_lobf_status(data->drm_fd, output->name)) {
+ igt_info("LOBF not supported. \n");
+ return false;
+ }
/* Reset output */
igt_display_reset(&data->display);
@@ -1030,13 +1075,21 @@ igt_main_args("drs:", long_opts, help_str, opt_handler, &data)
igt_subtest_with_dynamic("seamless-rr-switch-virtual")
run_vrr_test(&data, test_seamless_virtual_rr_basic, TEST_SEAMLESS_VIRTUAL_RR);
- igt_describe("Test to validate the the content rate exactly match with the "
+ igt_describe("Test to validate the content rate exactly match with the "
"requested rate without any frame drops.");
igt_subtest_with_dynamic("cmrr") {
igt_require(intel_display_ver(intel_get_drm_devid(data.drm_fd)) >= 20);
run_vrr_test(&data, test_cmrr, TEST_CMRR);
}
+
+ igt_describe("Test to validate the link-off between active frames in "
+ "non-PSR operation.");
+ igt_subtest_with_dynamic("lobf") {
+ igt_require(intel_display_ver(intel_get_drm_devid(data.drm_fd)) >= 20);
+
+ run_vrr_test(&data, test_lobf, TEST_LINK_OFF);
+ }
}
igt_fixture {
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 12:02 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] New test to validate link-off between active regions (LOBF) Jeevan B
2024-07-31 12:02 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/igt_kms: Added library functions for LOBF status Jeevan B
2024-07-31 12:02 ` Jeevan B [this message]
2024-07-31 12:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_vrr: Add new test to validate LOBF Joshi, Kunal1
2024-07-31 13:00 ` Modem, Bhanuprakash
2024-07-31 14:28 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for New test to validate link-off between active regions (LOBF) (rev5) Patchwork
2024-07-31 14:48 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-07-31 16:39 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-07-30 8:31 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] New test to validate link-off between active regions (LOBF) Jeevan B
2024-07-30 8:31 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_vrr: Add new test to validate LOBF Jeevan B
2024-07-30 12:44 ` Modem, Bhanuprakash
2024-07-31 9:22 ` B, Jeevan
2024-07-23 4:28 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] New test to validate link-off between active regions (LOBF) Jeevan B
2024-07-23 4:28 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_vrr: Add new test to validate LOBF Jeevan B
2024-07-23 11:47 ` Modem, Bhanuprakash
2024-07-22 7:50 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] New test to validate link-off between active regions (LOBF) Jeevan B
2024-07-22 7:50 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/kms_vrr: Add new test to validate LOBF Jeevan B
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240731120215.2946412-3-jeevan.b@intel.com \
--to=jeevan.b@intel.com \
--cc=animesh.manna@intel.com \
--cc=bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kunal1.joshi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.