All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: Use of_property_present()
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:12:45 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240731191312.1710417-7-robh@kernel.org> (raw)

Use of_property_present() to test for property presence rather than
of_(find|get)_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove
callers of of_find_property() and similar functions. of_find_property()
leaks the DT struct property and data pointers which is a problem for
dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c          | 2 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
index 087506e21508..376187ad5754 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_alloc(struct imx_dsp_rproc *priv)
 	struct mbox_client *cl;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
+	if (!of_property_present(dev->of_node, "mbox-names"))
 		return 0;
 
 	cl = &priv->cl;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 144c8e9a642e..8d7ecc809c67 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc)
 	if (priv->tx_ch && priv->rx_ch)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
+	if (!of_property_present(dev->of_node, "mbox-names"))
 		return 0;
 
 	cl = &priv->cl;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
index 596f3ffb8935..2cea97c746fd 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
 	r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[0];
 
 	/* Maintain backward compatibility for zynqmp by using hardcode TCM address. */
-	if (of_find_property(r5_core->np, "reg", NULL))
+	if (of_property_present(r5_core->np, "reg"))
 		ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(cluster);
 	else if (device_is_compatible(dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss"))
 		ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
 			return ret;
 		}
 
-		if (of_find_property(dev_of_node(dev), "xlnx,tcm-mode", NULL) ||
+		if (of_property_present(dev_of_node(dev), "xlnx,tcm-mode") ||
 		    device_is_compatible(dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss")) {
 			ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
 						       tcm_mode);
@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (of_find_property(dev_node, "xlnx,tcm-mode", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(dev_node, "xlnx,tcm-mode")) {
 		ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,tcm-mode", (u32 *)&tcm_mode);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-07-31 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-31 19:12 Rob Herring (Arm) [this message]
2024-08-01  1:51 ` [PATCH] remoteproc: Use of_property_present() Peng Fan
2024-08-13 15:24 ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240731191312.1710417-7-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.