All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package when possible
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 09:04:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240801-peculiar-soft-oarfish-acc596@lindesnes> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASR4KtTnP5sq32DNsbauFwMrtw8Q800ZyjCiqetFooYdQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 11:37:30AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:10 AM Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 04:42:04PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > A long standing issue in the upstream kernel packaging is that the
> > > linux-headers package is not cross-compiled.
> > >
> > > For example, you can cross-build Debian packages for arm64 by running
> > > the following command:
> > >
> > >   $ make ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- bindeb-pkg
> > >
> > > However, the generated linux-headers-*_arm64.deb is useless because the
> > > host programs in it were built for your build machine architecture
> > > (likely x86), not arm64.
> > >
> > > The Debian kernel maintains its own Makefiles to cross-compile host
> > > tools without relying on Kbuild. [1]
> > >
> > > Instead of adding such full custom Makefiles, this commit adds a small
> > > piece of code to cross-compile host programs located under the scripts/
> > > directory.
> > >
> > > A straightforward solution is to pass HOSTCC=${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc, but it
> > > would also cross-compile scripts/basic/fixdep, which needs to be native
> > > to process the if_changed_dep macro. (This approach may work under some
> > > circumstances; you can execute foreign architecture programs with the
> > > help of binfmt_misc because Debian systems enable CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC,
> > > but it would require installing QEMU and libc for that architecture.)
> > >
> > > A trick is to use the external module build (KBUILD_EXTMOD=), which
> > > does not rebuild scripts/basic/fixdep. ${CC} needs to be able to link
> > > userspace programs (CONFIG_CC_CAN_LINK=y).
> > >
> > > There are known limitations:
> > >
> > >  - GCC plugins
> > >
> > >    It would possible to rebuild GCC plugins for the target architecture
> > >    by passing HOSTCXX=${CROSS_COMPILE}g++ with necessary packages
> > >    installed, but gcc on the installed system emits
> > >    "cc1: error: incompatible gcc/plugin versions". I did not find a
> > >    solution for this because 'gcc' on a foreign architecture is a
> > >    different compiler after all.
> > >
> > >  - objtool and resolve_btfids
> > >
> > >    These are built by the tools build system. They are not covered by
> > >    the current solution.
> > >
> > > I only tested this with Debian, but it should work for other package
> > > systems as well.
> > >
> > > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/blob/debian/6.9.9-1/debian/rules.real#L586
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  scripts/package/install-extmod-build | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/scripts/package/install-extmod-build b/scripts/package/install-extmod-build
> > > index cc335945dfbc..0b56d3d7b48f 100755
> > > --- a/scripts/package/install-extmod-build
> > > +++ b/scripts/package/install-extmod-build
> > > @@ -43,4 +43,38 @@ mkdir -p "${destdir}"
> > >       fi
> > >  } | tar -c -f - -T - | tar -xf - -C "${destdir}"
> > >
> > > +# When ${CC} and ${HOSTCC} differ, we are likely cross-compiling. Rebuild host
> > > +# programs using ${CC}. This assumes CC=${CROSS_COMPILE}gcc, which is usually
> > > +# the case for package building. It does not cross-compile when CC=clang.
> > > +#
> > > +# This caters to host programs that participate in Kbuild. objtool and
> > > +# resolve_btfids are out of scope.
> >
> > Just for clarification: Why do you call both "out of scope" here?
> > Because they're not being built by kbuild, or because they will never be
> > needed for building oot kmods?
> 
> 
> I meant the former.
> 
> 
> Debian applies a tricky patch to the tools build system
> in order to cross-compile objtool:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/blob/debian/6.9.9-1/debian/patches/debian/fixdep-allow-overriding-hostcc-and-hostld.patch
> 
> It is not an elegant solution, though.
> 
> 
> I still believe the right thing to do is
> converting Makefiles for objtool and resolve_btfids into Kbuild style.
> 
> 
> objtool and resolve_btfids are necessary for building external modules,
> when CONFIG_OBJTOOL=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y, respectively.
> If these comments are confusing, I can delete them.

I think it's good to mention that cross-built linux-headers package is
still broken for CONFIG_OBJTOOL=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y.  I think
I'd add a sentence to the commit message and keep the comment here as it
is.

Kind regards,
Nicolas


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-01  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-27  7:42 [PATCH 0/4] kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package Masahiro Yamada
2024-07-27  7:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] modpost: remove unused HOST_ELFCLASS Masahiro Yamada
2024-07-31 20:43   ` Nicolas Schier
2024-07-27  7:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] modpost: detect endianness on run-time Masahiro Yamada
2024-07-31 20:47   ` Nicolas Schier
2024-07-27  7:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] kbuild: slim down package for building external modules Masahiro Yamada
2024-07-31 21:01   ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-24 12:27   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-08-24 16:58     ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-02-18 20:25   ` Jeffrey Hugo
2025-02-20 10:03     ` Nicolas Schier
2025-02-20 15:03       ` Jeffrey Hugo
2025-02-20 15:54         ` Nicolas Schier
2025-02-20 16:31           ` Jeffrey Hugo
2025-02-20 16:49             ` Greg KH
2025-02-20 17:24               ` Jeffrey Hugo
2025-02-20 17:43                 ` Greg KH
2025-02-20 18:12                   ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-02-28 22:04                   ` Jeffrey Hugo
2025-02-20 17:57                 ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-07-27  7:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] kbuild: cross-compile linux-headers package when possible Masahiro Yamada
2024-07-30  1:03   ` Kees Cook
2024-08-01  2:26     ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-07-31 21:10   ` Nicolas Schier
2024-08-01  2:37     ` Masahiro Yamada
2024-08-01  7:04       ` Nicolas Schier [this message]
2024-10-17 14:45   ` Ron Economos
2024-10-17 19:24     ` Nicolas Schier
2024-10-17 19:34       ` Ron Economos
2024-11-14 20:57         ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-11-16  8:03           ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240801-peculiar-soft-oarfish-acc596@lindesnes \
    --to=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.