From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
dsahern@kernel.org, kuniyu@amazon.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/7] tcp: completely support active reset
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 08:30:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240802083012.062e2c0e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240802102112.9199-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 18:21:05 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
>
> This time the patch series finally covers all the cases in the active
> reset logic. After this, we can know the related exact reason(s).
What happened to waiting 24h before posting the next version? :|
--
pv-bot: 24h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-02 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-02 10:21 [PATCH net-next v4 0/7] tcp: completely support active reset Jason Xing
2024-08-02 10:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/7] tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_ABORT_ON_CLOSE for " Jason Xing
2024-08-02 10:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/7] tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_ABORT_ON_LINGER " Jason Xing
2024-08-02 10:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/7] tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_ABORT_ON_MEMORY " Jason Xing
2024-08-02 10:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/7] tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_STATE " Jason Xing
2024-08-02 10:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/7] tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_KEEPALIVE_TIMEOUT " Jason Xing
2024-08-02 10:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/7] tcp: rstreason: introduce SK_RST_REASON_TCP_DISCONNECT_WITH_DATA " Jason Xing
2024-08-02 10:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 7/7] tcp: rstreason: let it work finally in tcp_send_active_reset() Jason Xing
2024-08-02 15:30 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-08-02 17:43 ` [PATCH net-next v4 0/7] tcp: completely support active reset Jason Xing
2024-08-07 9:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240802083012.062e2c0e@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.