From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+f7a1c2c2711e4a780f19@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
jolsa@kernel.org
Cc: acme@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
mhiramat@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [perf?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in __uprobe_unregister
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 14:35:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240811123504.GB30068@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240811121444.GA30068@redhat.com>
On 08/11, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Hmm, bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() looks obviously wrong.
>
> bpf_link_prime() is called after the
>
> for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> uprobe_register(...);
> ...
> }
>
> loop. If bpf_link_prime() fails, bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() just do
> kvfree(uprobes) without _unregister(). In particular, this leaks the freed
> bpf_uprobe->consumer in the uprobe->consumers list.
>
> After that another _unregister() on the same uprobe can hit the problem.
>
> I guess we need a simple patch for -stable...
Something like below on top of perf/core. But I don't like the usage of
"i" in the +error_unregister path...
Oleg.
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3486,17 +3486,19 @@ int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
&uprobes[i].consumer);
if (IS_ERR(uprobes[i].uprobe)) {
err = PTR_ERR(uprobes[i].uprobe);
- bpf_uprobe_unregister(uprobes, i);
- goto error_free;
+ goto error_unregister;
}
}
err = bpf_link_prime(&link->link, &link_primer);
if (err)
- goto error_free;
+ goto error_unregister;
return bpf_link_settle(&link_primer);
+error_unregister:
+ bpf_uprobe_unregister(uprobes, i);
+
error_free:
kvfree(uprobes);
kfree(link);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-11 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-10 20:17 [syzbot] [perf?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in __uprobe_unregister syzbot
2024-08-11 12:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-11 12:35 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-08-12 4:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-12 10:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-12 15:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-12 19:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-12 20:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-08-11 12:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-08-11 13:29 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240811123504.GB30068@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=syzbot+f7a1c2c2711e4a780f19@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.