All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev
Cc: lkp@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf lock contention: Change stack_id type to s32
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 02:24:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202408120233.2JuKgpj9-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

:::::: 
:::::: Manual check reason: "low confidence bisect report"
:::::: 

BCC: lkp@intel.com
CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
In-Reply-To: <20240810191704.1948365-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
References: <20240810191704.1948365-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
TO: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
TO: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
TO: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
TO: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
CC: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
CC: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
CC: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>

Hi Namhyung,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next]
[also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core perf-tools/perf-tools linus/master v6.11-rc2 next-20240809]
[cannot apply to acme/perf/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Namhyung-Kim/perf-lock-contention-Change-stack_id-type-to-s32/20240811-031933
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git perf-tools-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240810191704.1948365-1-namhyung%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH] perf lock contention: Change stack_id type to s32
:::::: branch date: 23 hours ago
:::::: commit date: 23 hours ago
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240812/202408120233.2JuKgpj9-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202408120233.2JuKgpj9-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   Makefile.config:671: No libunwind found. Please install libunwind-dev[el] >= 1.1 and/or set LIBUNWIND_DIR
     PERF_VERSION = 6.11.rc2.gcbe444bb08ed
   In file included from util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c:9:
>> util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h:10:2: error: unknown type name 's32'; did you mean 'u32'?
      10 |         s32 stack_id;
         |         ^~~
         |         u32
   util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h:17:15: note: 'u32' declared here
      17 | typedef __u32 u32;
         |               ^
   In file included from util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c:9:
   util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h:14:2: error: unknown type name 's32'; did you mean 'u32'?
      14 |         s32 stack_id;
         |         ^~~
         |         u32
   util/bpf_skel/vmlinux.h:17:15: note: 'u32' declared here
      17 | typedef __u32 u32;
         |               ^
   2 errors generated.
   make[5]: *** [Makefile.perf:1247: tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/.tmp/lock_contention.bpf.o] Error 1
   make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
   make[4]: *** [Makefile.perf:292: sub-make] Error 2
   make[3]: *** [Makefile:76: all] Error 2


vim +10 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_data.h

fd507d3e359c7e Namhyung Kim 2022-12-09   5  
b44d6653685939 Namhyung Kim 2024-02-27   6  struct tstamp_data {
b44d6653685939 Namhyung Kim 2024-02-27   7  	u64 timestamp;
b44d6653685939 Namhyung Kim 2024-02-27   8  	u64 lock;
b44d6653685939 Namhyung Kim 2024-02-27   9  	u32 flags;
cbe444bb08ed25 Namhyung Kim 2024-08-10 @10  	s32 stack_id;
b44d6653685939 Namhyung Kim 2024-02-27  11  };
b44d6653685939 Namhyung Kim 2024-02-27  12  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

             reply	other threads:[~2024-08-11 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-11 18:24 kernel test robot [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-08-09 12:29 [bug report] perf lock: Print the number of lost entries for BPF Dan Carpenter
2024-08-10 19:17 ` [PATCH] perf lock contention: Change stack_id type to s32 Namhyung Kim
2024-08-12 14:52   ` kernel test robot
2024-08-12 16:09   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-08-12 16:52     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-08-12 16:57       ` Namhyung Kim
2024-08-12 17:05         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202408120233.2JuKgpj9-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.