From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>,
"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y] Revert "selftests: mptcp: simult flows: mark 'unbalanced' tests as flaky"
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 17:31:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240812153133.574382-2-matttbe@kernel.org> (raw)
This reverts commit 052c9f0c140c78e5d6826688b5d2f33e19db0ae7.
If the test doesn't pass, we can get this error:
# ./simult_flows.sh: line 275: mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky: command not found
This patch is not needed in v6.6: it is there to mark a test as "flaky",
but the MPTCP selftests infrastructure in v6.6 doesn't support them. So
it looks better to revert this patch.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
index be97a7ed0950..f24bd2bf0831 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/simult_flows.sh
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ run_test()
do_transfer $small $large $time
lret=$?
mptcp_lib_result_code "${lret}" "${msg}"
- if [ $lret -ne 0 ] && ! mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky; then
+ if [ $lret -ne 0 ]; then
ret=$lret
[ $bail -eq 0 ] || exit $ret
fi
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ run_test()
do_transfer $large $small $time
lret=$?
mptcp_lib_result_code "${lret}" "${msg}"
- if [ $lret -ne 0 ] && ! mptcp_lib_subtest_is_flaky; then
+ if [ $lret -ne 0 ]; then
ret=$lret
[ $bail -eq 0 ] || exit $ret
fi
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ run_test 10 10 0 0 "balanced bwidth"
run_test 10 10 1 25 "balanced bwidth with unbalanced delay"
# we still need some additional infrastructure to pass the following test-cases
-MPTCP_LIB_SUBTEST_FLAKY=1 run_test 10 3 0 0 "unbalanced bwidth"
+run_test 10 3 0 0 "unbalanced bwidth"
run_test 10 3 1 25 "unbalanced bwidth with unbalanced delay"
run_test 10 3 25 1 "unbalanced bwidth with opposed, unbalanced delay"
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 15:31 Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) [this message]
2024-08-12 15:51 ` Patch "Revert "selftests: mptcp: simult flows: mark 'unbalanced' tests as flaky"" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree gregkh
2024-08-12 16:27 ` [PATCH 6.6.y] Revert "selftests: mptcp: simult flows: mark 'unbalanced' tests as flaky" MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240812153133.574382-2-matttbe@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.