From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, max8rr8@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: x86/kaslr: Expose and use the end of the physical memory address space
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 09:11:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202408150911.25D8591@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ed6soy3z.ffs@tglx>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:29:36AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> iounmap() on x86 occasionally fails to unmap because the provided valid
> ioremap address is not below high_memory. It turned out that this
> happens due to KASLR.
>
> KASLR uses the full address space between PAGE_OFFSET and vaddr_end to
> randomize the starting points of the direct map, vmalloc and vmemmap
> regions. It thereby limits the size of the direct map by using the
> installed memory size plus an extra configurable margin for hot-plug
> memory. This limitation is done to gain more randomization space
> because otherwise only the holes between the direct map, vmalloc,
> vmemmap and vaddr_end would be usable for randomizing.
>
> The limited direct map size is not exposed to the rest of the kernel, so
> the memory hot-plug and resource management related code paths still
> operate under the assumption that the available address space can be
> determined with MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS.
>
> request_free_mem_region() allocates from (1 << MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) - 1
> downwards. That means the first allocation happens past the end of the
> direct map and if unlucky this address is in the vmalloc space, which
> causes high_memory to become greater than VMALLOC_START and consequently
> causes iounmap() to fail for valid ioremap addresses.
>
> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS cannot be changed for that because the randomization
> does not align with address bit boundaries and there are other places
> which actually require to know the maximum number of address bits. All
> remaining usage sites of MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS have been analyzed and found
> to be correct.
>
> Cure this by exposing the end of the direct map via PHYSMEM_END and use
> that for the memory hot-plug and resource management related places
> instead of relying on MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS. In the KASLR case PHYSMEM_END
> maps to a variable which is initialized by the KASLR initialization and
> otherwise it is based on MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS as before.
>
> To prevent future hickups add a check into add_pages() to catch callers
> trying to add memory above PHYSMEM_END.
>
> Fixes: 0483e1fa6e09 ("x86/mm: Implement ASLR for kernel memory regions")
> Reported-by: Max Ramanouski <max8rr8@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Nice fix; thanks!
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-15 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 10:00 [PATCH 1/1] x86/ioremap: Use is_vmalloc_addr in iounmap Max Ramanouski
2024-08-08 6:12 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-08 6:44 ` John Hubbard
2024-08-12 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-08 14:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-08 15:58 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-08 16:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-08 16:32 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-08 16:39 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-08 18:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-08 19:59 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-09 2:28 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-09 3:55 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-10 17:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-12 7:41 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-12 10:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-12 11:46 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-12 12:10 ` Max R
2024-08-12 13:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-13 1:33 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-13 8:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-13 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-13 22:29 ` x86/kaslr: Expose and use the end of the physical memory address space Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-14 0:26 ` Alistair Popple
2024-08-14 14:33 ` Dan Williams
2024-08-15 16:11 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-08-15 22:48 ` Max R
2024-08-16 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-16 9:43 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-20 20:38 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-22 22:31 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202408150911.25D8591@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=max8rr8@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.