From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aijay Adams <aijay@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] netconsole: Populate dynamic entry even if netpoll fails
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 15:49:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240821154926.14785d66@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZsWjpuoszvApM1I0@gmail.com>
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 01:21:58 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> Another way to write this is:
>
> err = netpoll_setup(&nt->np);
> if (err) {
> pr_err("Not enabling netconsole. Netpoll setup failed\n");
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC))
> goto fail
> } else {
> nt->enabled = true;
> }
>
> is it better? Or, Is there a even better way to write this?
Yes, I think this is better! Or at least I wouldn't have made the same
mistake reading it if it was written this way :)
> > As for the message would it be more helpful to indicate target will be
> > disabled? Move the print after the check for dynamic and say "Netpoll
> > setup failed, netconsole target will be disabled" ?
>
> In both cases the target will be disabled, right? In one case, it will
> populate the cmdline0 configfs (if CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC is set),
> otherwise it will fail completely. Either way, netconsole will be
> disabled.
No strong feelings. I was trying to highlight that it's a single target
that ends up being disabled "netconsole disabled" sounds like the whole
netconsole module is completely out of commission.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-21 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-19 10:36 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] netconsole: Populate dynamic entry even if netpoll fails Breno Leitao
2024-08-19 10:36 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] netpoll: Ensure clean state on setup failures Breno Leitao
2024-08-20 23:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-21 8:44 ` Breno Leitao
2024-08-19 10:36 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] netconsole: pr_err() when netpoll_setup fails Breno Leitao
2024-08-20 23:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-21 8:41 ` Breno Leitao
2024-08-21 22:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-22 10:01 ` Breno Leitao
2024-08-19 10:36 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] netconsole: Populate dynamic entry even if netpoll fails Breno Leitao
2024-08-20 23:27 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-21 8:21 ` Breno Leitao
2024-08-21 22:49 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-08-22 11:00 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240821154926.14785d66@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=aijay@meta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.